Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome scan for cis-regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees

Sinha, Saurabh, Ling, Xu, Whitfield, Charles W., Zhai, Chengxiang, Robinson, Gene E.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) undergo an age-related, socially regulated transition from working in the hive to foraging, which is associated with changes in the expression of thousands of genes in the brain. To begin to study the cis-regulatory code underlying this massive social regulation of gene expression, we used the newly sequenced honey bee genome to scan the promoter regions of eight sets of behaviorally related genes differentially expressed in the brain in the context of division of labor among worker bees, for 41 cis-regulatory motifs previously characterized in Drosophila melanogaster . Binding sites for the transcription factors Hairy, GAGA, Adf1, Cf1, Snail, and Dri, known to function in nervous system development, olfactory learning, or hormone binding in Drosophila , were significantly associated with one or more gene sets. The presence of some binding sites also predicted expression patterns for as many as 71% of the genes in some gene sets. These results suggest that there is a robust relationship between cis and social regulation of brain gene expression, especially considering that we studied <15% of all known transcription factors. These results also suggest that transcriptional networks involved in the regulation of development in Drosophila are used to regulate behavioral development in adult honey bees. However, differences in gene regulation between these two processes are suggested by the finding that the promoter regions for the behaviorally related bee genes differed in both motif occurrence and G/C content relative to their Drosophila orthologs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0607448103

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. R Velarde, GE Robinson Fahrbach SE Insect Mol Biol, in press.

Cited by

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Sinha, S., Ling, X., Whitfield, C. W., Zhai, C., & Robinson, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Departments of *Computer Science and
  • Entomology,
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-10-31
Volume
103
Issue
44
Pages
16352-16357
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
52
References
36
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome scan for cis-regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0607448103
The paper
Sinha, S., Ling, X., Whitfield, C. W., Zhai, C., & Robinson, G. E. (2006). Genome scan for cis-regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607448103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.