Cited by 442Language and cultural evolutionSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLanguage Development and Disorders

Innateness and culture in the evolution of language

Open access
Kirby, Simon, Dowman, Mike, Griffiths, Thomas L.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human language arises from biological evolution, individual learning, and cultural transmission, but the interaction of these three processes has not been widely studied. We set out a formal framework for analyzing cultural transmission, which allows us to investigate how innate learning biases are related to universal properties of language. We show that cultural transmission can magnify weak biases into strong linguistic universals, undermining one of the arguments for strong innate constraints on language learning. As a consequence, the strength of innate biases can be shielded from natural selection, allowing these genes to drift. Furthermore, even when there is no natural selection, cultural transmission can produce apparent adaptations. Cultural transmission thus provides an alternative to traditional nativist and adaptationist explanations for the properties of human languages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0608222104

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of biases on culture tend to strengthen through repeated transmission.

    “Irrespective of their origin, the effects of biases on culture tend to strengthen through repeated transmission 99,104,105 .”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [105]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-03-20
Volume
104
Issue
12
Pages
5241-5245
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2106731506
Cited by
442
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
590.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0544708)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
cultural transmission, language evolution, innateness, language universals, natural selection, genetic drift, language learning, nativism, adaptationism, formal framework
MeSH terms
Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Language, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review