The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life-history evolution under a production constraint
Open accessAbstract
The recently formulated metabolic theory of ecology has profound implications for the evolution of life histories. Metabolic rate constrains the scaling of production with body mass, so that larger organisms have lower rates of production on a mass-specific basis than smaller ones. Here, we explore the implications of this constraint for life-history evolution. We show that for a range of very simple life histories, Darwinian fitness is equal to birth rate minus death rate. So, natural selection maximizes birth and production rates and minimizes death rates. This implies that decreased body size will generally be favored because it increases production, so long as mortality is unaffected. Alternatively, increased body size will be favored only if it decreases mortality or enhances reproductive success sufficiently to override the preexisting production constraint. Adaptations that may favor evolution of larger size include niche shifts that decrease mortality by escaping predation or that increase fecundity by exploiting new abundant food sources. These principles can be generalized to better understand the intimate relationship between the genetic currency of evolution and the metabolic currency of ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Megaherbivores: The Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology
Owen-Smith, R. N. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565441 · Cited by 955
Cope's Rule and the Dynamics of Body Mass Evolution in North American Fossil Mammals
Alroy, J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.731 · Cited by 539
The relationship between abundance and body size in British birds
Nee, S., Read, A. F., Greenwood, J. J. D., & Harvey, P. H. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351312a0 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Ellis (2009) · doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7 · Cited by 1,592
Verberk, W. C. E. P., Atkinson, D., Hoefnagel, K. N., Hirst, A. G., Horne, C. R., & Siepel, H. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12653 · Cited by 363
Effects of body size and lifestyle on evolution of mammal life histories
Sibly, R. M., & Brown, J. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707725104 · Cited by 280
Self-citationBison body size and climate change.
Martin, J. M., Mead, J. I., & Barboza, P. S. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4019 · Cited by 103
Smaers, J. B., Dechmann, D. K. N., Goswami, A., Soligo, C., & Safi, K. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1212181109 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. H., & Sibly, R. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-11-21
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 17595-17599
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2115941903
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life-history evolution under a production constraint. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0608522103
- The paper
- Brown, J. H., & Sibly, R. M. (2006). Life-history evolution under a production constraint. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608522103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.