The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells
Open accessAbstract
The proliferative compartment of stratified squamous epithelia consists of stem and transient amplifying (TA) keratinocytes. Some polypeptides are more abundant in putative epidermal stem cells than in TA cells, but no polypeptide confined to the stem cells has yet been identified. Here we show that the p63 transcription factor, a p53 homologue essential for regenerative proliferation in epithelial development, distinguishes human keratinocyte stem cells from their TA progeny. Within the cornea, nuclear p63 is expressed by the basal cells of the limbal epithelium, but not by TA cells covering the corneal surface. Human keratinocyte stem and TA cells when isolated in culture give rise to holoclones and paraclones, respectively. We show by clonal analysis that p63 is abundantly expressed by epidermal and limbal holoclones, but is undetectable in paraclones. TA keratinocytes, immediately after their withdrawal from the stem cell compartment (meroclones), have greatly reduced p63, even though they possess very appreciable proliferative capacity. Clonal evolution (i.e., generation of TA cells from precursor stem cells) is promoted by the sigma isoform of the 14-3-3 family of proteins. Keratinocytes whose 14-3-3σ has been down-regulated remain in the stem cell compartment and maintain p63 during serial cultivation. The identification of p63 as a keratinocyte stem cell marker will be of practical importance for the clinical application of epithelial cultures in cell therapy as well as for studies on epithelial tumorigenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cotsarelis, G., Sun, T.-T., & Lavker, R. M. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90696-c · Cited by 2,276
Slowly cycling (label‐retaining) epidermal cells behave like clonogenic stem cells in vitro
Morris, R. J., & Potten, C. S. (1994) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2184.1994.tb01425.x · Cited by 207
Cited by
Yap1 acts downstream of α-catenin to control epidermal proliferation
Schlegelmilch, K., Mohseni, M., Kirak, O., Pruszak, J., Rodriguez, J. R., Zhou, D., Kreger, B. T., Vasioukhin, V., Avruch, J., Brummelkamp, T. R., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.031 · Cited by 1,036
Stem cells in tissue engineering
Bianco, P., & Robey, P. G. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102181 · Cited by 965
p63 Is Essential for the Proliferative Potential of Stem Cells in Stratified Epithelia
Senoo, M., Pinto, F., Crum, C. P., & McKeon, F. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.045 · Cited by 881
Self-citationGetting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis
Fuchs, E., & Raghavan, S. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg758 · Cited by 753
p63 and p73: Roles in Development and Tumor Formation
Moll, U. M., & Slade, N. (2004) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.371.2.7 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Pellegrini, G., Dellambra, E., Golisano, O., Martinelli, E., Fantozzi, I., Bondanza, S., Ponzin, D., McKeon, F., & De Luca, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-03-13
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3156-3161
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2168211018
- Cited by
- 1,363
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 64.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.061032098
- The paper
- Pellegrini, G., Dellambra, E., Golisano, O., Martinelli, E., Fantozzi, I., Bondanza, S., Ponzin, D., McKeon, F., & De Luca, M. (2001). p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.061032098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.