The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein identification by spectral networks analysis
Open accessAbstract
Advances in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) steadily increase the rate of generation of MS/MS spectra. As a result, the existing approaches that compare spectra against databases are already facing a bottleneck, particularly when interpreting spectra of modified peptides. Here we explore a concept that allows one to perform an MS/MS database search without ever comparing a spectrum against a database. We propose to take advantage of spectral pairs, which are pairs of spectra obtained from overlapping (often nontryptic) peptides or from unmodified and modified versions of the same peptide. Having a spectrum of a modified peptide paired with a spectrum of an unmodified peptide allows one to separate the prefix and suffix ladders, to greatly reduce the number of noise peaks, and to generate a small number of peptide reconstructions that are likely to contain the correct one. The MS/MS database search is thus reduced to extremely fast pattern-matching (rather than time-consuming matching of spectra against databases). In addition to speed, our approach provides a unique paradigm for identifying posttranslational modifications by means of spectral networks analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer
Ferrara, N., Hillan, K. J., Gerber, H.-P., & Novotny, W. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1381 · Cited by 2,625
Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data
Nesvizhskii, A. I., & Aebersold, R. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r500012-mcp200 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Wang, M., Carver, J. J., Phelan, V. V., Sanchez, L. M., Garg, N., Peng, Y., Nguyen, D. D., Watrous, J., Kapono, C. A., Luzzatto-Knaan, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3597 · Cited by 4,629
Self-citationProtein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Identification of lysine succinylation as a new post-translational modification
Zhang, Z., Tan, M., Xie, Z., Dai, L., Chen, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2011) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.495 · Cited by 1,027
Molecular Networking as a Dereplication Strategy
Yang, J. Y., Sanchez, L. M., Rath, C. M., Liu, X., Boudreau, P. D., Bruns, N., Glukhov, E., Wodtke, A., de Felicio, R., Fenner, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np400413s · Cited by 607
ProLuCID: An improved SEQUEST-like algorithm with enhanced sensitivity and specificity
Xu, T., Park, S. K., Venable, J. D., Wohlschlegel, J. A., Diedrich, J. K., Cociorva, D., Lu, B., Liao, L., Hewel, J., Han, X., et al. (2015) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.001 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandeira, N., Tsur, D., Frank, A., & Pevzner, P. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-04-10
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6140-6145
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2018375934
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein identification by spectral networks analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0701130104
- The paper
- Bandeira, N., Tsur, D., Frank, A., & Pevzner, P. A. (2007). Protein identification by spectral networks analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701130104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.