The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanism and uses of a membrane peptide that targets tumors and other acidic tissues in vivo
Open accessAbstract
The pH-selective insertion and folding of a membrane peptide, pHLIP [pH (low) insertion peptide], can be used to target acidic tissue in vivo , including acidic foci in tumors, kidneys, and inflammatory sites. In a mouse breast adenocarcinoma model, fluorescently labeled pHLIP finds solid acidic tumors with high accuracy and accumulates in them even at a very early stage of tumor development. The fluorescence signal is stable for >4 days and is approximately five times higher in tumors than in healthy counterpart tissue. In a rat antigen-induced arthritis model, pHLIP preferentially accumulates in inflammatory foci. pHLIP also maps the renal cortical interstitium; however, kidney accumulation can be reduced significantly by providing mice with bicarbonate-containing drinking water. The peptide has three states: soluble in water, bound to the surface of a membrane, and inserted across the membrane as an α-helix. At physiological pH, the equilibrium is toward water, which explains its low affinity for cells in healthy tissue; at acidic pH, titration of Asp residues shifts the equilibrium toward membrane insertion and tissue accumulation. The replacement of two key Asp residues located in the transmembrane part of pHLIP by Lys or Asn led to the loss of pH-sensitive insertion into membranes of liposomes, red blood cells, and cancer cells in vivo , as well as to the loss of specific accumulation in tumors. pHLIP nanotechnology introduces a new method of detecting, targeting, and possibly treating acidic diseased tissue by using the selective insertion and folding of membrane peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coussens, L. M., & Werb, Z. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01322 · Cited by 15,111
IL-23 promotes tumour incidence and growth
Langowski, J. L., Zhang, X., Wu, L., Mattson, J. D., Chen, T., Smith, K., Basham, B., McClanahan, T., Kastelein, R. A., & Oft, M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04808 · Cited by 1,018
Non‐Invasive in vivo Imaging in Small Animal Research
Koo, V., Hamilton, P. W., & Williamson, K. (2006) · Analytical Cellular Pathology · doi:10.1155/2006/245619 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Overcoming the Blood–Brain Barrier: The Role of Nanomaterials in Treating Neurological Diseases
Furtado, D., Björnmalm, M., Ayton, S., Bush, A. I., Kempe, K., & Caruso, F. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801362 · Cited by 708
The Use of Therapeutic Peptides to Target and to Kill Cancer Cells
J. Boohaker, R., W. Lee, M., Vishnubhotla, P., M. Perez, J. L., & R. Khaled, A. (2012) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986712801661004 · Cited by 302
Targeted Suppression of miRNA-33 Using pHLIP Improves Atherosclerosis Regression
Zhang, X., Rotllan, N., Canfrán-Duque, A., Sun, J., Toczek, J., Moshnikova, A., Malik, S., Price, N. L., Araldi, E., Zhong, W., et al. (2022) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.121.320296 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreev, O. A., Dupuy, A. D., Segala, M., Sandugu, S., Serra, D. A., Chichester, C. O., Engelman, D. M., & Reshetnyak, Y. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-05-08
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7893-7898
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2144775514
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.