Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A genome-wide approach to identify genetic variants that contribute to etoposide-induced cytotoxicity

Open access
Huang, R. Stephanie, Duan, Shiwei, Bleibel, Wasim K., Kistner, Emily O., Zhang, Wei, Clark, Tyson A., Chen, Tina X., Schweitzer, Anthony C., Blume, John E., Cox, Nancy J., Dolan, M. Eileen·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Large interindividual variance has been observed in sensitivity to drugs. To comprehensively decipher the genetic contribution to these variations in drug susceptibility, we present a genome-wide model using human lymphoblastoid cell lines from the International HapMap consortium, of which extensive genotypic information is available, to identify genetic variants that contribute to chemotherapeutic agent-induced cytotoxicity. Our model integrated genotype, gene expression, and sensitivity of HapMap cell lines to drugs. Cell lines derived from 30 trios of European descent (Center d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain population) and 30 trios of African descent (Yoruban population) were used. Cell growth inhibition at increasing concentrations of etoposide for 72 h was determined by using alamarBlue assay. Gene expression on 176 HapMap cell lines (87 Center d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain population and 89 Yoruban population) was determined by using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Exon 1.0ST Array. We evaluated associations between genotype and cytotoxicity, genotype and gene expression and correlated gene expression of the identified candidates with cytotoxicity. The analysis identified 63 genetic variants that contribute to etoposide-induced toxicity through their effect on gene expression. These include genes that may play a role in cancer ( AGPAT2 , IL1B , and WNT5B ) and genes not yet known to be associated with sensitivity to etoposide. This unbiased method can be used to elucidate genetic variants contributing to a wide range of cellular phenotypes induced by chemotherapeutic agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0703736104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Huang, R. S., Duan, S., Bleibel, W. K., Kistner, E. O., Zhang, W., Clark, T. A., Chen, T. X., Schweitzer, A. C., Blume, J. E., Cox, N. J., & Dolan, M. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
104
Issue
23
Pages
9758-9763
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2021151787
Cited by
198
References
1
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A genome-wide approach to identify genetic variants that contribute to etoposide-induced cytotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0703736104
The paper
Huang, R. S., Duan, S., Bleibel, W. K., Kistner, E. O., Zhang, W., Clark, T. A., Chen, T. X., Schweitzer, A. C., Blume, J. E., Cox, N. J., & Dolan, M. E. (2007). A genome-wide approach to identify genetic variants that contribute to etoposide-induced cytotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703736104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.