The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Input–output robustness in simple bacterial signaling systems
Open accessAbstract
Biological signaling systems produce an output, such as the level of a phosphorylated protein, in response to defined input signals. The output level as a function of the input level is called the system's input–output relation. One may ask whether this input–output relation is sensitive to changes in the concentrations of the system's components, such as proteins and ATP. Because component concentrations often vary from cell to cell, it might be expected that the input–output relation will likewise vary. If this is the case, different cells exposed to the same input signal will display different outputs. Such variability can be deleterious in systems where survival depends on accurate match of output to input. Here we suggest a mechanism that can provide input–output robustness, that is, an input–output relation that does not depend on variations in the concentrations of any of the system's components. The mechanism is based on certain bacterial signaling systems. It explains how specific molecular details can work together to provide robustness. Moreover, it suggests an approach that can help identify a wide family of nonequilibrium mechanisms that potentially have robust input–output relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441
Kitano, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1471 · Cited by 2,278
Reverse engineering of biological complexity
Csete, M. E., & Doyle, J. C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069981 · Cited by 1,215
Control of rRNA Expression by Small Molecules Is Dynamic and Nonredundant
Murray, H. D., Schneider, D. A., & Gourse, R. L. (2003) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00266-1 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Deciding fate in adverse times: Sporulation and competence in Bacillus subtilis
Schultz, D., Wolynes, P. G., Jacob, E. B., & Onuchic, J. N. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912185106 · Cited by 201
The Utility of Paradoxical Components in Biological Circuits
Hart, Y., & Alon, U. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.004 · Cited by 151
Self-citationBayesian design of synthetic biological systems
Barnes, C. P., Silk, D., Sheng, X., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1017972108 · Cited by 90
Theoretical basis for cell deaths
Himeoka, Y., Horiguchi, S. A., & Kobayashi, T. J. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043217 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Shinar, G., Milo, R., Martínez, M. R., & Alon, U.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-12-11
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 19931-19935
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2141977920
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Input–output robustness in simple bacterial signaling systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0706792104
- The paper
- Shinar, G., Milo, R., Martínez, M. R., & Alon, U. (2007). Input–output robustness in simple bacterial signaling systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706792104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.