Cited by 91Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Bayesian design of synthetic biological systems

Open access
Barnes, Chris P., Silk, Daniel, Sheng, Xia, Stumpf, Michael P. H.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Here we introduce a new design framework for synthetic biology that exploits the advantages of Bayesian model selection. We will argue that the difference between inference and design is that in the former we try to reconstruct the system that has given rise to the data that we observe, whereas in the latter, we seek to construct the system that produces the data that we would like to observe, i.e., the desired behavior. Our approach allows us to exploit methods from Bayesian statistics, including efficient exploration of models spaces and high-dimensional parameter spaces, and the ability to rank models with respect to their ability to generate certain types of data. Bayesian model selection furthermore automatically strikes a balance between complexity and (predictive or explanatory) performance of mathematical models. To deal with the complexities of molecular systems we employ an approximate Bayesian computation scheme which only requires us to simulate from different competing models to arrive at rational criteria for choosing between them. We illustrate the advantages resulting from combining the design and modeling (or in silico prototyping) stages currently seen as separate in synthetic biology by reference to deterministic and stochastic model systems exhibiting adaptive and switch-like behavior, as well as bacterial two-component signaling systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1017972108

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Target conditions could include clinical settings which are generally not experimentally amenable; the current approach offers a rationale for designing therapeutic interventions into complex systems based on investigations of suitable model systems [49].

    “Target conditions could, for example, include clinical settings which are generally not experimentally amenable (at least in early stage research); here the current approach offers a rationale for designing [49] therapeutic interventions into complex systems based on investigations of suitable model systems.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Robert CP, Cornuet JM, Marin JM, Pillai N (2011) Lack of confidence in ABC model choice. arXiv:1102.4432v4. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, C. P., Silk, D., Sheng, X., & Stumpf, M. P. H.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IN)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-08-29
Volume
108
Issue
37
Pages
15190-15195
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2135141237
Cited by
90
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F005210/1, BB/G020434/1, BB/C519670/1, BB/G007934/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
synthetic biology design, Bayesian model selection, approximate Bayesian computation, model ranking, model complexity, stochastic gene expression, adaptive behavior, switch-like behavior, two-component systems, bacterial signaling
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Bacteria, Bayes Theorem, Stochastic Processes, Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review