The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus : Quantifying the life cycle
Open accessAbstract
Most microbes have complex life cycles with multiple modes of reproduction that differ in their effects on DNA sequence variation. Population genomic analyses can therefore be used to estimate the relative frequencies of these different modes in nature. The life cycle of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus is complex, including clonal reproduction, outcrossing, and two different modes of inbreeding. To quantify these different aspects we analyzed DNA sequence variation in the third chromosome among 20 isolates from two populations. Measures of mutational and recombinational diversity were used to make two independent estimates of the population size. In an obligately sexual population these values should be approximately equal. Instead there is a discrepancy of about three orders of magnitude between our two estimates of population size, indicating that S. paradoxus goes through a sexual cycle approximately once in every 1,000 asexual generations. Chromosome III also contains the mating type locus ( MAT ), which is the most outbred part in the entire genome, and by comparing recombinational diversity as a function of distance from MAT we estimate the frequency of matings to be ≈94% from within the same tetrad, 5% with a clonemate after switching the mating type, and 1% outcrossed. Our study illustrates the utility of population genomic data in quantifying life cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Drake, J. W., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Crow, J. F. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667 · Cited by 1,932
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: Efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA
Brudno, M., Do, C. B., Cooper, G. M., Kim, M. F., Davydov, E., Program, N. C. S., Green, E. D., Sidow, A., & Batzoglou, S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.926603 · Cited by 1,115
Cited by
Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates
Peter, J., De Chiara, M., Friedrich, A., Yue, J.-X., Pflieger, D., Bergström, A., Sigwalt, A., Barre, B., Freel, K., Llored, A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5 · Cited by 1,117
Evolution at two levels of gene expression in yeast
Artieri, C. G., & Fraser, H. B. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.165522.113 · Cited by 138
Conserved meiotic genes point to sex in the Choanoflagellates
CARR, M., LEADBEATER, B. S. C., & BALDAUF, S. L. (2010) · Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00450.x · Cited by 41
Cortimiglia, C., Alonso-Del-Real, J., Belloso Daza, M. V., Querol, A., Iacono, G., & Cocconcelli, P. S. (2024) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof10090646 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, I. J., Bensasson, D., Burt, A., & Koufopanou, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-03-25
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4957-4962
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2097374545
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus : Quantifying the life cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0707314105
- The paper
- Tsai, I. J., Bensasson, D., Burt, A., & Koufopanou, V. (2008). Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus : Quantifying the life cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707314105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.