Cited by 398Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: Mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants

Open access
Pobric, Gorana, Jefferies, Elizabeth, Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Studies of semantic dementia and PET neuroimaging investigations suggest that the anterior temporal lobes (ATL) are a critical substrate for semantic representation. In stark contrast, classical neurological models of comprehension do not include ATL, and likewise functional MRI studies often fail to show activations in the ATL, reinforcing the classical view. Using a novel application of low-frequency, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the ATL, we demonstrate that the behavioral pattern of semantic dementia can be mirrored in neurologically intact participants: Specifically, we show that temporary disruption to neural processing in the ATL produces a selective semantic impairment leading to significant slowing in both picture naming and word comprehension but not to other equally demanding, nonsemantic cognitive tasks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0707383104

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00034-8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 397

Metadata

Authors
Pobric, G., Jefferies, E., & Ralph, M. A. L.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-12-11
Volume
104
Issue
50
Pages
20137-20141
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2169670326
Cited by
398
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (078734/Z05/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
anterior temporal lobe, semantic representation, semantic dementia, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, semantic impairment, picture naming, word comprehension, semantic processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Dementia, Female, Health, Humans, Male, Semantics, Temporal Lobe, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review