Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline

Open access
Best, Robert B., Merchant, Kusai A., Gopich, Irina V., Schuler, Benjamin, Bax, Ad, Eaton, William A.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Polyproline has recently been used as a spacer between donor and acceptor chromophores to help establish the accuracy of distances determined from single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements. This work showed that the FRET efficiency in water is higher than expected for a rigid spacer and was attributed to the flexibility of the polypeptide. Here, we investigate this issue further, using a combination of single-molecule fluorescence intensity and lifetime measurements, NMR, theory, and molecular dynamics simulations of polyproline-20 that include the dyes and their linkers to the polypeptide. NMR shows that in water ≈30% of the molecules contain internal cis prolines, whereas none are detectable in trifluoroethanol. Simulations suggest that the all-trans form of polyproline is relatively stiff, with persistence lengths of 9–13 nm using different established force fields, and that the kinks arising from internal cis prolines are primarily responsible for the higher mean FRET efficiency in water. We show that the observed efficiency histograms and distributions of donor fluorescence lifetimes are explained by the presence of multiple species with efficiencies consistent with the simulations and populations determined by NMR. In calculating FRET efficiencies from the simulation, we find that the fluctuations of the chromophores, attached to long flexible linkers, also play an important role. A similar simulation approach suggests that the flexibility of the chromophore linkers is largely responsible for the previously unexplained high value of R 0 required to fit the data in the classic study of Stryer and Haugland.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0709567104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Best, R. B., Merchant, K. A., Gopich, I. V., Schuler, B., Bax, A., & Eaton, W. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-11-27
Volume
104
Issue
48
Pages
18964-18969
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2043294570
Cited by
209
References
1
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0709567104
The paper
Best, R. B., Merchant, K. A., Gopich, I. V., Schuler, B., Bax, A., & Eaton, W. A. (2007). Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709567104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.