The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline
Open accessAbstract
Polyproline has recently been used as a spacer between donor and acceptor chromophores to help establish the accuracy of distances determined from single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements. This work showed that the FRET efficiency in water is higher than expected for a rigid spacer and was attributed to the flexibility of the polypeptide. Here, we investigate this issue further, using a combination of single-molecule fluorescence intensity and lifetime measurements, NMR, theory, and molecular dynamics simulations of polyproline-20 that include the dyes and their linkers to the polypeptide. NMR shows that in water ≈30% of the molecules contain internal cis prolines, whereas none are detectable in trifluoroethanol. Simulations suggest that the all-trans form of polyproline is relatively stiff, with persistence lengths of 9–13 nm using different established force fields, and that the kinks arising from internal cis prolines are primarily responsible for the higher mean FRET efficiency in water. We show that the observed efficiency histograms and distributions of donor fluorescence lifetimes are explained by the presence of multiple species with efficiencies consistent with the simulations and populations determined by NMR. In calculating FRET efficiencies from the simulation, we find that the fluctuations of the chromophores, attached to long flexible linkers, also play an important role. A similar simulation approach suggests that the flexibility of the chromophore linkers is largely responsible for the previously unexplained high value of R 0 required to fit the data in the classic study of Stryer and Haugland.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Cited by
Energy landscape in protein folding and unfolding
Mallamace, F., Corsaro, C., Mallamace, D., Vasi, S., Vasi, C., Baglioni, P., Buldyrev, S. V., Chen, S.-H., & Stanley, H. E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524864113 · Cited by 122
A quantitative measure for protein conformational heterogeneity
Lyle, N., Das, R. K., & Pappu, R. V. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4812791 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Best, R. B., Merchant, K. A., Gopich, I. V., Schuler, B., Bax, A., & Eaton, W. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-11-27
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 18964-18969
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2043294570
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0709567104
- The paper
- Best, R. B., Merchant, K. A., Gopich, I. V., Schuler, B., Bax, A., & Eaton, W. A. (2007). Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709567104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.