The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential patterning of cGMP in vascular smooth muscle cells revealed by single GFP-linked biosensors
Open accessAbstract
Here, we report the design of unprecedented, non-FRET based cGMP-biosensors, named FlincGs, to assess the dynamics of nitric oxide (NO) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) induced synthesis of intracellular cGMP, [cGMP] i . Regulatory fragments of PKG I α, PKG I β, and an N-terminal deletion mutant of PKG I α were fused to circular permutated EGFP to generate α-, β-, and δ-FlincG, with high dynamic ranges and apparent K D,cGMP values of 35 nM, 1.1 μM, and 170 nM, respectively. All indicators displayed significant selectivity for cGMP over cAMP, and 1.5- to 2.1-fold increases in fluorescence intensity at 510 nm when excited at 480 nm. Surprisingly, FlincGs displayed an additional excitation peak at 410 nm. δ-FlincG permitted ratiometric (480/410 nm) measurements, with a cGMP-specific 3.5-fold ratio change. In addition, δ-FlincG presented cGMP association and dissociation kinetics sufficiently fast to monitor rapid changes of [cGMP] i in intact cells. In unpassaged, adenoviral transfected vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells, δ-FlincG had an EC 50,cGMP of 150 nM, and revealed transient global cGMP elevations to sustained physiological NO (EC 50,DEA/NO = 4 nM), and the decay phase depended on the activity of PDE-5. In contrast, ANP elicited sustained submembrane elevations in [cGMP] i , which were converted to global cGMP elevations by inhibition of PDE-5 by sildenafil. These results indicate that FlincG is an innovative tool to elucidate the dynamics of a central biological signal, cGMP, and that NO and natriuretic peptides induce distinct cGMP patterning under the regulation of PDE-5, and therefore likely differentially engage cGMP targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Imaging cytosolic NADH-NAD(+) redox state with a genetically encoded fluorescent biosensor
Hung, Y. P., Albeck, J. G., Tantama, M., & Yellen, G. (2011) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.012 · Cited by 509
What is the real physiological NO concentration in vivo?
Hall, C. N., & Garthwaite, J. (2009) · Nitric Oxide · doi:10.1016/j.niox.2009.07.002 · Cited by 378
Phosphodiesterase 9A controls nitric-oxide-independent cGMP and hypertrophic heart disease
Lee, D. I., Zhu, G., Sasaki, T., Cho, G.-S., Hamdani, N., Holewinski, R., Jo, S.-H., Danner, T., Zhang, M., Rainer, P. P., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14332 · Cited by 353
Self-citationConnecting the Chemical and Biological Properties of Nitric Oxide
Toledo, J. C., & Augusto, O. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx300042g · Cited by 286
Garthwaite, J. (2010) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/s11010-009-0318-8 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Nausch, L. W. M., Ledoux, J., Bonev, A. D., Nelson, M. T., & Dostmann, W. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-01-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 365-370
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1986217842
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential patterning of cGMP in vascular smooth muscle cells revealed by single GFP-linked biosensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0710387105
- The paper
- Nausch, L. W. M., Ledoux, J., Bonev, A. D., Nelson, M. T., & Dostmann, W. R. (2008). Differential patterning of cGMP in vascular smooth muscle cells revealed by single GFP-linked biosensors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710387105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.