Cited by 115T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Lineage infidelity in myeloid cells with TCR gene rearrangement: A latent developmental potential of proT cells revealed by ectopic cytokine receptor signaling

Open access
King, Angela G., Kondo, Motonari, Scherer, David C., Weissman, Irving L.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The most immature lymphoid-committed progenitors in both the bone marrow (common lymphoid progenitor) and thymus (proT1) maintain a latent granulocyte/macrophage (G/M) differentiation potential that can be initiated by signals emanating from exogenously expressed IL-2 receptors. In this study, we investigate at which developmental stage thymocytes lose this G/M differentiation potential. We demonstrate that the next maturational stage after proT1 cells (proT2), but not preT (TN3) cells, can convert cell fate from lymphoid to myeloid in response to ectopic IL-2 receptor signaling in human IL-2Rbeta transgenic mice. It is significant that approximately 10% of clonogenic G/M colonies derived from proT cells of IL-2Rbeta transgenic mice have DJ rearrangement specifically at the Dbeta1 but not Dbeta2 segment in the TCRbeta locus. No TCR gene rearrangement is observed in G/M cells from nontransgenic mice, suggesting that the G/M cells we observe in this system were truly lymphoid-committed before stimulation with IL-2. In addition, Dbeta1 and Dbeta2 DJ rearrangement of the TCRbeta gene may be differentially regulated and thus serve as markers for distinct proT cell maturational stages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.072087899

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ETP and DN2 cells can generate myeloid cells if removed from the thymus, whereas pro-T cells past PU.1 expression (DN3 or later) do not make myeloid cells under these conditions.

    “Whereas ETP and DN2 cells can generate myeloid cells if removed from the thymus, pro-T cells that have differentiated past the stage of PU.1 expression in the thymus (i.e., from the DN2 stage to the DN3 stage or later) do not make myeloid cells under these conditions”

    From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results (page not specified) show that isolated proT1 and proT2 cells generated granulocyte/macrophage cells, whereas TN3 and TN4 cells did not, in the tested cultures. But proT2 myeloid development required ectopic IL-2 receptor expression and added human IL-2; removal from the thymus alone was not sufficient. The cited passages also do not establish PU.1 expression as the reason for the DN2-to-DN3 boundary. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Capone, M., Hockett, R. D., Jr. & Zlotnik, A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12522-12527.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, A. G., Kondo, M., Scherer, D. C., & Weissman, I. L.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kondo, Motonari
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-03-26
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
4508-4513
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2154577970
Cited by
115
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Institutes of Health (5r35ca042551-13)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Cancer Institute (CA09302, CA 42551, T32CA009302)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI047458, AI47457, AI47458, R01AI047458, R01AI047457)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
lineage infidelity, myeloid cells, T cell development, TCR beta gene rearrangement, IL-2 receptor signaling, common lymphoid progenitors
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Interleukin-2, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, T-Lymphocytes, Gene Rearrangement, T-Lymphocyte, Receptors, Interleukin-2, Cell Lineage, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review