The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes
Open accessAbstract
The movement paths of individuals over landscapes are basically represented by sequences of points ( x i , y i ) occurring at times t i . Theoretically, these points can be viewed as being generated by stochastic processes that in the simplest cases are Gaussian random walks on featureless landscapes. Generalizations have been made of walks that ( i ) take place on landscapes with features, ( ii ) have correlated distributions of velocity and direction of movement in each time interval, ( iii ) are Lévy processes in which distance or waiting-time (time-between steps) distributions have infinite moments, or ( iv ) have paths bounded in space and time. We begin by demonstrating that rather mild truncations of fat-tailed step-size distributions have a dramatic effect on dispersion of organisms, where such truncations naturally arise in real walks of organisms bounded by space and, more generally, influenced by the interactions of physiological, behavioral, and ecological factors with landscape features. These generalizations permit not only increased realism and hence greater accuracy in constructing movement pathways, but also provide a biogeographically detailed epistemological framework for interpreting movement patterns in all organisms, whether tossed in the wind or willfully driven. We illustrate the utility of our framework by demonstrating how fission–fusion herding behavior arises among individuals endeavoring to satisfy both nutritional and safety demands in heterogeneous environments. We conclude with a brief discussion of potential methods that can be used to solve the inverse problem of identifying putative causal factors driving movement behavior on known landscapes, leaving details to references in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movement
Avgar, T., Potts, J. R., Lewis, M. A., & Boyce, M. S. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12528 · Cited by 594
Animals and the zoogeochemistry of the carbon cycle
Schmitz, O. J., Wilmers, C. C., Leroux, S. J., Doughty, C. E., Atwood, T. B., Galetti, M., Davies, A. B., & Goetz, S. J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3213 · Cited by 372
Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research
Williams, H. J., Taylor, L. A., Benhamou, S., Bijleveld, A. I., Clay, T. A., de Grissac, S., Demšar, U., English, H. M., Franconi, N., Gómez‐Laich, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13094 · Cited by 333
Tsalyuk, M., Kilian, W., Reineking, B., & Getz, W. M. (2019) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1348 · Cited by 98
Self-citationEstimating carnivoran diets using a combination of carcass observations and scats from GPS clusters
Tambling, C. J., Laurence, S. D., Bellan, S. E., Cameron, E. Z., du Toit, J. T., & Getz, W. M. (2012) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Getz, W. M., & Saltz, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-12-09
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 19066-19071
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2006874756
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0801732105
- The paper
- Getz, W. M., & Saltz, D. (2008). A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801732105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.