Cited by 50Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Estimating carnivoran diets using a combination of carcass observations and scats from GPS clusters

Open access
Tambling, C. J., Laurence, S. D., Bellan, S. E., Cameron, E. Z., du Toit, J. T., Getz, W. M.·2012·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Scat analysis is one of the most frequently used methods to assess carnivoran diets and Global Positioning System (GPS) cluster methods are increasingly being used to locate feeding sites for large carnivorans. However, both methods have inherent biases that limit their use. GPS methods to locate kill sites are biased towards large carcasses, while scat analysis over-estimates the biomass consumed from smaller prey. We combined carcass observations and scats collected along known movement routes, assessed using GPS data from four African lion (Panthera leo) prides in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, to determine how a combination of these two datasets change diet estimates. As expected, using carcasses alone under-estimated the number of feeding events on small species, primarily impala (Aepyceros melampus) and warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), in our case by more than 50% and thus significantly under-estimated the biomass consumed per pride per day in comparison to when the diet was assessed using carcass observations alone. We show that an approach that supplements carcass observations with scats that enables the identification of potentially missed feeding events increases the estimates of food intake rates for large carnivorans, with possible ramifications for predator-prey interaction studies dealing with biomass intake rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00856.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van Kesteren F Analysis of the diet of African Lions (Panthera leo) in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe Wildlife Conservation Research Unit 2006 Oxford University of Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tambling, C. J., Laurence, S. D., Bellan, S. E., Cameron, E. Z., du Toit, J. T., & Getz, W. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • Enviro‐Insight Murrayfield Pretoria South Africa
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Mammal Research Institute Department of Zoology and Entomology University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
Corresponding author
Tambling, C. J.
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09
Volume
286
Issue
2
Pages
102-109
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W1781229619
Cited by
50
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083863)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
scat analysis, African lion, lion, foraging site selection, eating speed, impala, warthog, predator-prey interactions, Kruger National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review