Cited by 248Nanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsImmunotoxicology and immune responsesAnimal testing and alternatives

Perturbational profiling of nanomaterial biologic activity

Open access
Shaw, Stanley Y., Westly, Elizabeth C., Pittet, Mikael J., Subramanian, Aravind, Schreiber, Stuart L., Weissleder, Ralph·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Our understanding of the biologic effects (including toxicity) of nanomaterials is incomplete. In vivo animal studies remain the gold standard; however, widespread testing remains impractical, and the development of in vitro assays that correlate with in vivo activity has proven challenging. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of analyzing in vitro nanomaterial activity in a generalizable, systematic fashion. We assessed nanoparticle effects in a multidimensional manner, using multiple cell types and multiple assays that reflect different aspects of cellular physiology. Hierarchical clustering of these data identifies nanomaterials with similar patterns of biologic activity across a broad sampling of cellular contexts, as opposed to extrapolating from results of a single in vitro assay. We show that this approach yields robust and detailed structure–activity relationships. Furthermore, a subset of nanoparticles were tested in mice, and nanoparticles with similar activity profiles in vitro exert similar effects on monocyte number in vivo . These data suggest a strategy of multidimensional characterization of nanomaterials in vitro that can inform the design of novel nanomaterials and guide studies of in vivo activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0802878105

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To develop predictive nano-SAR models of ENMs toxicity, it is useful to identify critical biological pathways that can lead to adverse outcomes.

    “Clearly, to develop predictive nano-SAR models of ENMs toxicity, it is useful to identify critical biological pathways that can lead to adverse outcomes.238”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [238]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, S. Y., Westly, E. C., Pittet, M. J., Subramanian, A., Schreiber, S. L., & Weissleder, R.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Center for Systems Biology,
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-05-27
Volume
105
Issue
21
Pages
7387-7392
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1969896692
Cited by
248
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 25
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Broad Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (n01co12400-79-0-22, N01-CO-12400, 5u54ca119349-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL077186, U01HL080731)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01CO12400, N01-CO-012400, P50CA086355, U54 CA-119349)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
nanomaterial toxicity, structure-activity relationship, hierarchical clustering, nanomaterial design
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Assay, Cell Line, Humans, Materials Testing, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Structure-Activity Relationship, Cluster Analysis, Mice, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review