Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Excessive genomic DNA copy number variation in the Li–Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome

Open access
Shlien, Adam, Tabori, Uri, Marshall, Christian R., Pienkowska, Malgorzata, Feuk, Lars, Novokmet, Ana, Nanda, Sonia, Druker, Harriet, Scherer, Stephen W., Malkin, David·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

DNA copy number variations (CNVs) are a significant and ubiquitous source of inherited human genetic variation. However, the importance of CNVs to cancer susceptibility and tumor progression has not yet been explored. Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominantly inherited disorder characterized by a strikingly increased risk of early-onset breast cancer, sarcomas, brain tumors and other neoplasms in individuals harboring germline TP53 mutations. Known genetic determinants of LFS do not fully explain the variable clinical phenotype in affected family members. As part of a wider study of CNVs and cancer, we conducted a genome-wide profile of germline CNVs in LFS families. Here, by examining DNA from a large healthy population and an LFS cohort using high-density oligonucleotide arrays, we show that the number of CNVs per genome is well conserved in the healthy population, but strikingly enriched in these cancer-prone individuals. We found a highly significant increase in CNVs among carriers of germline TP53 mutations with a familial cancer history. Furthermore, we identified a remarkable number of genomic regions in which known cancer-related genes coincide with CNVs, in both LFS families and healthy individuals. Germline CNVs may provide a foundation that enables the more dramatic chromosomal changes characteristic of TP53-related tumors to be established. Our results suggest that screening families predisposed to cancer for CNVs may identify individuals with an abnormally high number of these events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0802970105

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Shlien, A., Tabori, U., Marshall, C. R., Pienkowska, M., Feuk, L., Novokmet, A., Nanda, S., Druker, H., Scherer, S. W., & Malkin, D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-08-12
Volume
105
Issue
32
Pages
11264-11269
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2127310589
Cited by
203
References
5
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Excessive genomic DNA copy number variation in the Li–Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0802970105
The paper
Shlien, A., Tabori, U., Marshall, C. R., Pienkowska, M., Feuk, L., Novokmet, A., Nanda, S., Druker, H., Scherer, S. W., & Malkin, D. (2008). Excessive genomic DNA copy number variation in the Li–Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802970105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.