Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

C-terminal peptides coassemble into Aβ42 oligomers and protect neurons against Aβ42-induced neurotoxicity

Open access
Fradinger, Erica A., Monien, Bernhard H., Urbanc, Brigita, Lomakin, Aleksey, Tan, Miao, Li, Huiyuan, Spring, Sean M., Condron, Margaret M., Cruz, Luis, Xie, Cui-Wei, Benedek, George B., Bitan, Gal·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an age-related disorder that threatens to become an epidemic as the world population ages. Neurotoxic oligomers of Aβ42 are believed to be the main cause of AD; therefore, disruption of Aβ oligomerization is a promising approach for developing therapeutics for AD. Formation of Aβ42 oligomers is mediated by intermolecular interactions in which the C terminus plays a central role. We hypothesized that peptides derived from the C terminus of Aβ42 may get incorporated into oligomers of Aβ42, disrupt their structure, and thereby inhibit their toxicity. We tested this hypothesis using Aβ fragments with the general formula Aβ( x −42) ( x = 28–39). A cell viability screen identified Aβ(31–42) as the most potent inhibitor. In addition, the shortest peptide, Aβ(39–42), also had high activity. Both Aβ(31–42) and Aβ(39–42) inhibited Aβ-induced cell death and rescued disruption of synaptic activity by Aβ42 oligomers at micromolar concentrations. Biophysical characterization indicated that the action of these peptides likely involved stabilization of Aβ42 in nontoxic oligomers. Computer simulations suggested a mechanism by which the fragments coassembled with Aβ42 to form heterooligomers. Thus, Aβ(31–42) and Aβ(39–42) are leads for obtaining mechanism-based drugs for treatment of AD using a systematic structure–activity approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0807163105

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Fradinger, E. A., Monien, B. H., Urbanc, B., Lomakin, A., Tan, M., Li, H., Spring, S. M., Condron, M. M., Cruz, L., Xie, C.-W., Benedek, G. B., & Bitan, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-09-16
Volume
105
Issue
37
Pages
14175-14180
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1986139836
Cited by
186
References
7
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: C-terminal peptides coassemble into Aβ42 oligomers and protect neurons against Aβ42-induced neurotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0807163105
The paper
Fradinger, E. A., Monien, B. H., Urbanc, B., Lomakin, A., Tan, M., Li, H., Spring, S. M., Condron, M. M., Cruz, L., Xie, C.-W., Benedek, G. B., & Bitan, G. (2008). C-terminal peptides coassemble into Aβ42 oligomers and protect neurons against Aβ42-induced neurotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807163105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.