Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RETRACTED: Notch1 regulates the fate of cardiac progenitor cells

Open access
Boni, Alessandro, Urbanek, Konrad, Nascimbene, Angelo, Hosoda, Toru, Zheng, Hanqiao, Delucchi, Francesca, Amano, Katsuya, Gonzalez, Arantxa, Vitale, Serena, Ojaimi, Caroline, Rizzi, Roberto, Bolli, Roberto, Yutzey, Katherine E., Rota, Marcello, Kajstura, Jan, Anversa, Piero, Leri, Annarosa·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The Notch receptor mediates cell fate decision in multiple organs. In the current work we tested the hypothesis that Nkx2.5 is a target gene of Notch1 and raised the possibility that Notch1 regulates myocyte commitment in the adult heart. Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) in the niches express Notch1 receptor, and the supporting cells exhibit the Notch ligand Jagged1. The nuclear translocation of Notch1 intracellular domain (N1ICD) up-regulates Nkx2.5 in CPCs and promotes the formation of cycling myocytes in vitro . N1ICD and RBP-Jk form a protein complex, which in turn binds to the Nkx2.5 promoter initiating transcription and myocyte differentiation. In contrast, transcription factors of vascular cells are down-regulated by Jagged1 activation of the Notch1 pathway. Importantly, inhibition of Notch1 in infarcted mice impairs the commitment of resident CPCs to the myocyte lineage opposing cardiomyogenesis. These observations indicate that Notch1 favors the early specification of CPCs to the myocyte phenotype but maintains the newly formed cells in a highly proliferative state. Dividing Nkx2.5-positive myocytes correspond to transit amplifying cells, which condition the replicative capacity of the heart. In conclusion, Notch1 may have critical implications in the control of heart homeostasis and its adaptation to pathologic states.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0808357105This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Boni, A., Urbanek, K., Nascimbene, A., Hosoda, T., Zheng, H., Delucchi, F., Amano, K., Gonzalez, A., Vitale, S., Ojaimi, C., Rizzi, R., Bolli, R., Yutzey, K. E., Rota, M., Kajstura, J., Anversa, P., & Leri, A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-10-07
Volume
105
Issue
40
Pages
15529-15534
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2164369044
Cited by
188
References
1
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RETRACTED: Notch1 regulates the fate of cardiac progenitor cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0808357105
The paper
Boni, A., Urbanek, K., Nascimbene, A., Hosoda, T., Zheng, H., Delucchi, F., Amano, K., Gonzalez, A., Vitale, S., Ojaimi, C., Rizzi, R., Bolli, R., Yutzey, K. E., Rota, M., Kajstura, J., Anversa, P., & Leri, A. (2008). RETRACTED: Notch1 regulates the fate of cardiac progenitor cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808357105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.