The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The phage abortive infection system, ToxIN, functions as a protein–RNA toxin–antitoxin pair
Open accessAbstract
Various mechanisms exist that enable bacteria to resist bacteriophage infection. Resistance strategies include the abortive infection (Abi) systems, which promote cell death and limit phage replication within a bacterial population. A highly effective 2-gene Abi system from the phytopathogen Erwinia carotovora subspecies atroseptica , designated ToxIN, is described. The ToxIN Abi system also functions as a toxin–antitoxin (TA) pair, with ToxN inhibiting bacterial growth and the tandemly repeated ToxI RNA antitoxin counteracting the toxicity. TA modules are currently divided into 2 classes, protein and RNA antisense. We provide evidence that ToxIN defines an entirely new TA class that functions via a novel protein-RNA mechanism, with analogous systems present in diverse bacteria. Despite the debated role of TA systems, we demonstrate that ToxIN provides viral resistance in a range of bacterial genera against multiple phages. This is the first demonstration of a novel mechanistic class of TA systems and of an Abi system functioning in different bacterial genera, both with implications for the dynamics of phage-bacterial interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 1×
“The rapid turnover of such large quantities of organic material impacts on nutrient cycling and the global climate (4, 5).”
Background
Cited by
The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes
Hampton, H. G., Watson, B. N. J., & Fineran, P. C. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8 · Cited by 917
Self-citationRevenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences
Samson, J. E., Magadán, A. H., Sabri, M., & Moineau, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3096 · Cited by 698
The phage‐host arms race: Shaping the evolution of microbes
Stern, A., & Sorek, R. (2011) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000071 · Cited by 527
Abortive Infection: Bacterial Suicide as an Antiviral Immune Strategy
Lopatina, A., Tal, N., & Sorek, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Virology · doi:10.1146/annurev-virology-011620-040628 · Cited by 478
CRISPR-Cas: biology, mechanisms and relevance
Hille, F., & Charpentier, E. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0496 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Fineran, P. C., Blower, T. R., Foulds, I. J., Humphreys, D. P., Lilley, K. S., & Salmond, G. P. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-20
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 894-899
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1977293483
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phage abortive infection system, ToxIN, functions as a protein–RNA toxin–antitoxin pair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0808832106
- The paper
- Fineran, P. C., Blower, T. R., Foulds, I. J., Humphreys, D. P., Lilley, K. S., & Salmond, G. P. C. (2009). The phage abortive infection system, ToxIN, functions as a protein–RNA toxin–antitoxin pair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808832106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.