Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 81

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins

Premo, L. S., Hublin, Jean-Jacques·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Paleogenomic research has shown that modern humans, Neanderthals, and their most recent common ancestor have displayed less genetic diversity than living great apes. The traditional interpretation that low levels of genetic diversity in modern humans resulted from a relatively recent demographic bottleneck cannot account for similarly low levels of genetic diversity in Middle Pleistocene hominins. A more parsimonious hypothesis proposes that the effective population size of the human lineage has been low for more than 500,000 years, but the mechanism responsible for suppressing genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominin populations without similarly affecting that of their hominoid contemporaries remains unknown. Here we use agent-based simulation to study the effect of culturally mediated migration on neutral genetic diversity in structured populations. We show that, in populations structured by culturally mediated migration, selection can suppress neutral genetic diversity over thousands of generations, even in the absence of bottlenecks or expansions in census population size. In other words, selection could have suppressed the effective population size of Pleistocene hominins for as long as the degree of cultural similarity between regionally differentiated groups played an important role in mediating intraspecific gene flow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0809194105

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5077 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/84773 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.021 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/79855 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020057 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1961 · DOI
  7. AR Rogers, HC Harpending, Population growth makes waves in distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol 9, 552–569 (1992).
  8. 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.361 · DOI
  9. 10.1086/204195 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.gde.2004.08.010 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3320 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)8:3<81::AID-EVAN3>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026233 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025749 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1153717 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/genetics/129.2.513 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s002510050380 · DOI
  18. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132359 · DOI
  19. 10.1146/annurev.genom.3.022502.103200 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02086.x · DOI
  21. R Boyd, PJ Richerson Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985).
  22. 10.1002/evan.10113 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S0016672300031748 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884670 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/genetics/146.1.427 · DOI · Paper page
  26. S Wright, The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc Sixth Int Congr Genet 1, 356–366 (1932).
  27. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0708280104 · DOI
  29. 10.1556/Select.3.2002.1.9 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.282.5394.1708 · DOI · Paper page
  31. JD Clark The Origin of Modern Humans and the Impact of Chronometric Data, eds MJ Aitken, CB Stringer, P Mellars (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton), pp. 201–215 (1993).
  32. FT Masao Continuity or Replacement? Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, eds G Brauer, FH Smith (Balkema, Rotterdam), pp. 99–109 (1992).
  33. S McBrearty Human Roots: Africa and Asia in the Middle Pleistocene, eds LS Barham, K Robson-Brown (West Acad Specialist, Bristol, United Kingdom), pp. 81–97 (2001).
  34. 10.1006/jhev.2000.0435 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.008 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.04.002 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.02.008 · DOI
  38. M Nei, S Kumar Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics (Oxford Univ Press, New York, 2000). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Premo, L. S., & Hublin, J.-J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-01-06
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
33-37
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
81
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0809194105
The paper
Premo, L. S., & Hublin, J.-J. (2009). Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809194105