The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins
Abstract
Paleogenomic research has shown that modern humans, Neanderthals, and their most recent common ancestor have displayed less genetic diversity than living great apes. The traditional interpretation that low levels of genetic diversity in modern humans resulted from a relatively recent demographic bottleneck cannot account for similarly low levels of genetic diversity in Middle Pleistocene hominins. A more parsimonious hypothesis proposes that the effective population size of the human lineage has been low for more than 500,000 years, but the mechanism responsible for suppressing genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominin populations without similarly affecting that of their hominoid contemporaries remains unknown. Here we use agent-based simulation to study the effect of culturally mediated migration on neutral genetic diversity in structured populations. We show that, in populations structured by culturally mediated migration, selection can suppress neutral genetic diversity over thousands of generations, even in the absence of bottlenecks or expansions in census population size. In other words, selection could have suppressed the effective population size of Pleistocene hominins for as long as the degree of cultural similarity between regionally differentiated groups played an important role in mediating intraspecific gene flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Competition between demes can dramatically reduce genetic diversity within a population1, especially if the population is structured such that variation is greater between demes than within demes.”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequencing and analysis of Neanderthal genomic DNA
Noonan, J. P., Coop, G., Kudaravalli, S., Smith, D., Krause, J., Alessi, J., Chen, F., Platt, D., Pääbo, S., Pritchard, J. K., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131412 · Cited by 629
Systematic Pigment Use in the Middle Pleistocene of South‐Central Africa
Barham, L. S. (2002) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/338292 · Cited by 305
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5077 · DOI
- 10.1038/84773 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.021 · DOI
- 10.1038/79855 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020057 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1961 · DOI
- AR Rogers, HC Harpending, Population growth makes waves in distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol 9, 552–569 (1992).
- 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.361 · DOI
- 10.1086/204195 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gde.2004.08.010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3320 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)8:3<81::AID-EVAN3>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026233 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025749 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1153717 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/129.2.513 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s002510050380 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132359 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.genom.3.022502.103200 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02086.x · DOI
- R Boyd, PJ Richerson Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985).
- 10.1002/evan.10113 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0016672300031748 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884670 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/146.1.427 · DOI · Paper page
- S Wright, The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc Sixth Int Congr Genet 1, 356–366 (1932).
- 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0708280104 · DOI
- 10.1556/Select.3.2002.1.9 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.282.5394.1708 · DOI · Paper page
- JD Clark The Origin of Modern Humans and the Impact of Chronometric Data, eds MJ Aitken, CB Stringer, P Mellars (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton), pp. 201–215 (1993).
- FT Masao Continuity or Replacement? Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, eds G Brauer, FH Smith (Balkema, Rotterdam), pp. 99–109 (1992).
- S McBrearty Human Roots: Africa and Asia in the Middle Pleistocene, eds LS Barham, K Robson-Brown (West Acad Specialist, Bristol, United Kingdom), pp. 81–97 (2001).
- 10.1006/jhev.2000.0435 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2004.02.008 · DOI
- M Nei, S Kumar Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics (Oxford Univ Press, New York, 2000). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Zeng, T. C., Aw, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Premo, L. S., & Hublin, J.-J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-06
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-37
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0809194105
- The paper
- Premo, L. S., & Hublin, J.-J. (2009). Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809194105