Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunization by vaccine-coated microneedle arrays protects against lethal influenza virus challenge

Open access
Zhu, Qiyun, Zarnitsyn, Vladimir G., Ye, Ling, Wen, Zhiyuan, Gao, Yulong, Pan, Lei, Skountzou, Ioanna, Gill, Harvinder S., Prausnitz, Mark R., Yang, Chinglai, Compans, Richard W.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Influenza prophylaxis would benefit from a simple method to administer influenza vaccine into skin without the need for hypodermic needles. In this study, solid metal microneedle arrays (MNs) were investigated as a system for cutaneous vaccine delivery using influenza virus antigen. The MNs with 5 monument-shaped microneedles per array were produced and coated with inactivated influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (IIV). As much as 10 μg of viral proteins could be coated onto an array of 5 microneedles, and the coated IIV was delivered into skin at high efficiency within minutes. The coated MNs were used to immunize mice in comparison with conventional intramuscular injection at the same dose. Analysis of immune responses showed that a single immunization with IIV-coated MNs induced strong antibody responses against influenza virus, with significant levels of hemagglutination inhibition activities (>1:40), which were comparable to those induced by conventional intramuscular immunization. Moreover, mice immunized by a single dose of IIV coated on MNs were effectively protected against lethal challenge by a high dose of mouse-adapted influenza virus A/PR/8/34. These results show that MNs are highly effective as a simple method of vaccine delivery to elicit protective immune responses against virus infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0812652106

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, Q., Zarnitsyn, V. G., Ye, L., Wen, Z., Gao, Y., Pan, L., Skountzou, I., Gill, H. S., Prausnitz, M. R., Yang, C., & Compans, R. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-05-12
Volume
106
Issue
19
Pages
7968-7973
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2116085039
Cited by
211
References
1
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunization by vaccine-coated microneedle arrays protects against lethal influenza virus challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0812652106
The paper
Zhu, Q., Zarnitsyn, V. G., Ye, L., Wen, Z., Gao, Y., Pan, L., Skountzou, I., Gill, H. S., Prausnitz, M. R., Yang, C., & Compans, R. W. (2009). Immunization by vaccine-coated microneedle arrays protects against lethal influenza virus challenge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812652106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.