Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Slowed conduction and ventricular tachycardia after targeted disruption of the cardiac sodium channel gene Scn5a

Open access
Papadatos, G. Alex, Wallerstein, Polly M. R., Head, Catherine E. G., Ratcliff, Rosemary, Brady, Peter A., Benndorf, Klaus, Saumarez, Richard C., Trezise, Ann E. O., Huang, Christopher L.-H., Vandenberg, Jamie I., Colledge, William H., Grace, Andrew A.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Voltage-gated sodium channels drive the initial depolarization phase of the cardiac action potential and therefore critically determine conduction of excitation through the heart. In patients, deletions or loss-of-function mutations of the cardiac sodium channel gene, SCN5A , have been associated with a wide range of arrhythmias including bradycardia (heart rate slowing), atrioventricular conduction delay, and ventricular fibrillation. The pathophysiological basis of these clinical conditions is unresolved. Here we show that disruption of the mouse cardiac sodium channel gene, Scn5a , causes intrauterine lethality in homozygotes with severe defects in ventricular morphogenesis whereas heterozygotes show normal survival. Whole-cell patch clamp analyses of isolated ventricular myocytes from adult Scn5a +/− mice demonstrate a ≈50% reduction in sodium conductance. Scn5a +/− hearts have several defects including impaired atrioventricular conduction, delayed intramyocardial conduction, increased ventricular refractoriness, and ventricular tachycardia with characteristics of reentrant excitation. These findings reconcile reduced activity of the cardiac sodium channel leading to slowed conduction with several apparently diverse clinical phenotypes, providing a model for the detailed analysis of the pathophysiology of arrhythmias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.082121299

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Papadatos, G. A., Wallerstein, P. M. R., Head, C. E. G., Ratcliff, R., Brady, P. A., Benndorf, K., Saumarez, R. C., Trezise, A. E. O., Huang, C. L.-H., Vandenberg, J. I., Colledge, W. H., & Grace, A. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-04-23
Volume
99
Issue
9
Pages
6210-6215
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2003284163
Cited by
386
References
42
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slowed conduction and ventricular tachycardia after targeted disruption of the cardiac sodium channel gene Scn5a. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.082121299
The paper
Papadatos, G. A., Wallerstein, P. M. R., Head, C. E. G., Ratcliff, R., Brady, P. A., Benndorf, K., Saumarez, R. C., Trezise, A. E. O., Huang, C. L.-H., Vandenberg, J. I., Colledge, W. H., & Grace, A. A. (2002). Slowed conduction and ventricular tachycardia after targeted disruption of the cardiac sodium channel gene Scn5a. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082121299

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.