The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of aliphatic biodegradable photoluminescent polymers
Open accessAbstract
None of the current biodegradable polymers can function as both implant materials and fluorescent imaging probes. The objective of this study was to develop aliphatic biodegradable photoluminescent polymers (BPLPs) and their associated cross-linked variants (CBPLPs) for biomedical applications. BPLPs are degradable oligomers synthesized from biocompatible monomers including citric acid, aliphatic diols, and various amino acids via a convenient and cost-effective polycondensation reaction. BPLPs can be further cross-linked into elastomeric cross-linked polymers, CBPLPs. We have shown representatively that BPLP-cysteine (BPLP-Cys) and BPLP-serine (BPLP-Ser) offer advantages over the traditional fluorescent organic dyes and quantum dots because of their preliminarily demonstrated cytocompatibility in vitro, minimal chronic inflammatory responses in vivo, controlled degradability and high quantum yields (up to 62.33%), tunable fluorescence emission (up to 725 nm), and photostability. The tensile strength of CBPLP-Cys film ranged from 3.25 ± 0.13 MPa to 6.5 ± 0.8 MPa and the initial Modulus was in a range of 3.34 ± 0.15 MPa to 7.02 ± 1.40 MPa. Elastic CBPLP-Cys could be elongated up to 240 ± 36%. The compressive modulus of BPLP-Cys (0.6) (1:1:0.6 OD:CA:Cys) porous scaffold was 39.60 ± 5.90 KPa confirming the soft nature of the scaffolds. BPLPs also possess great processability for micro/nano-fabrication. We demonstrate the feasibility of using BPLP-Ser nanoparticles (“biodegradable quantum dots”) for in vitro cellular labeling and noninvasive in vivo imaging of tissue engineering scaffolds. The development of BPLPs and CBPLPs represents a new direction in developing fluorescent biomaterials and could impact tissue engineering, drug delivery, bioimaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tough biodegradable elastomer
Wang, Y., Ameer, G. A., Sheppard, B. J., & Langer, R. (2002) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0602-602 · Cited by 1,314
Cited by
Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles
Choi, H. S., Liu, W., Liu, F., Nasr, K., Misra, P., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.314 · Cited by 754
Polymeric nanoparticles: the future of nanomedicine
Banik, B. L., Fattahi, P., & Brown, J. L. (2016) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1364 · Cited by 485
Mehdizadeh, M., Weng, H., Gyawali, D., Tang, L., & Yang, J. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.055 · Cited by 422
Self-citationEssner, J. B., Kist, J. A., Polo-Parada, L., & Baker, G. A. (2018) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04446 · Cited by 316
Xi, Y., Ge, J., Guo, Y., Lei, B., & Ma, P. X. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b01152 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Gautam, S., Liu, L., Dey, J., Chen, W., Mason, R. P., Serrano, C. A., Schug, K. A., & Tang, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-06-23
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 10086-10091
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2126183119
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of aliphatic biodegradable photoluminescent polymers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0900004106
- The paper
- Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Gautam, S., Liu, L., Dey, J., Chen, W., Mason, R. P., Serrano, C. A., Schug, K. A., & Tang, L. (2009). Development of aliphatic biodegradable photoluminescent polymers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900004106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.