The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli
Open accessAbstract
Visual crowding is a breakdown in object identification that occurs in cluttered scenes, a process that represents the principle restriction on visual performance in the periphery. When crowded objects are presented experimentally, a key finding is that observers frequently report nearby flanking items instead of the target. This observation has led to the proposal that crowding reflects increased noise in the positional code for objects; although how the presence of nearby objects might disrupt positional encoding remains unclear. We quantified this disruption using cross-like stimuli, where observers judged whether the horizontal target line was positioned above or below the stimulus midpoint. Overall, observers were poorer at judging position in the presence of crowding flankers. However, offsetting horizontal lines in the flankers also led observers to report that the horizontal line in the target was shifted in the same direction, an effect that held for subthreshold flanker offsets. In short, crowding induced both random and systematic errors in observers' judgment of position, with or without the detection of flanker structure. Computational modeling reveals that perceived position in the presence of flankers follows a weighted average of noisy target- and flanker-line positions, rather than a substitution of flanker-features into the target, as has been proposed previously. Together, our results suggest that crowding is a preattentive process that uses averaging to regularize the noisy representation of position in the periphery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition
Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005 · Cited by 849
Metamers of the ventral stream
Freeman, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2889 · Cited by 667
Robol, V., Tibber, M. S., Anderson, E. J., Bobin, T., Carlin, P., Shergill, S. S., & Dakin, S. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060951 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenwood, J. A., Bex, P. J., & Dakin, S. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-08-04
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 13130-13135
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2099931883
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0901352106
- The paper
- Greenwood, J. A., Bex, P. J., & Dakin, S. C. (2009). Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901352106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.