Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of survival and disease progression with chromosomal instability: A genomic exploration of colorectal cancer

Open access
Sheffer, Michal, Bacolod, Manny D., Zuk, Or, Giardina, Sarah F., Pincas, Hanna, Barany, Francis, Paty, Philip B., Gerald, William L., Notterman, Daniel A., Domany, Eytan·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

During disease progression the cells that comprise solid malignancies undergo significant changes in gene copy number and chromosome structure. Colorectal cancer provides an excellent model to study this process. To indentify and characterize chromosomal abnormalities in colorectal cancer, we performed a statistical analysis of 299 expression and 130 SNP arrays profiled at different stages of the disease, including normal tissue, adenoma, stages 1–4 adenocarcinoma, and metastasis. We identified broad (> 1/2 chromosomal arm) and focal (< 1/2 chromosomal arm) events. Broad amplifications were noted on chromosomes 7, 8q, 13q, 20, and X and broad deletions on chromosomes 4, 8p, 14q, 15q, 17p, 18, 20p, and 22q. Focal events (gains or losses) were identified in regions containing known cancer pathway genes, such as VEGFA , MYC , MET , FGF6 , FGF23 , LYN , MMP9 , MYBL2 , AURKA , UBE2C , and PTEN . Other focal events encompassed potential new candidate tumor suppressors (losses) and oncogenes (gains), including CCDC68 , CSMD1 , POLR1D , and PMEPA1 . From the expression data, we identified genes whose expression levels reflected their copy number changes and used this relationship to impute copy number changes to samples without accompanying SNP data. This analysis provided the statistical power to show that deletions of 8p, 4p, and 15q are associated with survival and disease progression, and that samples with simultaneous deletions in 18q, 8p, 4p, and 15q have a particularly poor prognosis. Annotation analysis reveals that the oxidative phosphorylation pathway shows a strong tendency for decreased expression in the samples characterized by poor prognosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0902232106

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Sheffer, M., Bacolod, M. D., Zuk, O., Giardina, S. F., Pincas, H., Barany, F., Paty, P. B., Gerald, W. L., Notterman, D. A., & Domany, E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-04-28
Volume
106
Issue
17
Pages
7131-7136
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2128502368
Cited by
414
References
36
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of survival and disease progression with chromosomal instability: A genomic exploration of colorectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0902232106
The paper
Sheffer, M., Bacolod, M. D., Zuk, O., Giardina, S. F., Pincas, H., Barany, F., Paty, P. B., Gerald, W. L., Notterman, D. A., & Domany, E. (2009). Association of survival and disease progression with chromosomal instability: A genomic exploration of colorectal cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902232106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.