Cited by 379Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesLanguage and cultural evolution

Additional evidence on the use of personal ornaments in the Middle Paleolithic of North Africa

Open access
d'Errico, Francesco, Vanhaeren, Marian, Barton, Nick, Bouzouggar, Abdeljalil, Mienis, Henk, Richter, Daniel, Hublin, Jean-Jacques, McPherron, Shannon P. +1 more·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent investigations into the origins of symbolism indicate that personal ornaments in the form of perforated marine shell beads were used in the Near East, North Africa, and SubSaharan Africa at least 35 ka earlier than any personal ornaments in Europe. Together with instances of pigment use, engravings, and formal bone tools, personal ornaments are used to support an early emergence of behavioral modernity in Africa, associated with the origin of our species and significantly predating the timing for its dispersal out of Africa. Criticisms have been leveled at the low numbers of recovered shells, the lack of secure dating evidence, and the fact that documented examples were not deliberately shaped. In this paper, we report on 25 additional shell beads from four Moroccan Middle Paleolithic sites. We review their stratigraphic and chronological contexts and address the issue of these shells having been deliberately modified and used. We detail the results of comparative analyses of modern, fossil, and archaeological assemblages and microscopic examinations of the Moroccan material. We conclude that Nassarius shells were consistently used for personal ornamentation in this region at the end of the last interglacial. Absence of ornaments at Middle Paleolithic sites postdating Marine Isotope Stage 5 raises the question of the possible role of climatic changes in the disappearance of this hallmark of symbolic behavior before its reinvention 40 ka ago. Our results suggest that fu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0903532106

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A second wave of material evidence is the use of perforated seashells as shell beads starting at between 135,000-90,000 BP in the Levant, 83,000 BP in North Africa, and around 75,000 BP in South Africa; these shells were worn in strings and sometimes covered in red ochre.

    “A second wave of material evidence is the use of perforated seashells as shell beads starting at between 135,000 BP-90,000 BP in the Levant (Skhul and Qafzeh, Israel), 83,000 BP in North Africa (Grotte des Pigeons, Taforalt, and Ifri n'Ammar, Morocco), and around 75,000 BP in South Africa (Blombos Cave). These shells were worn in strings around the body; in some cases they were covered in red och”

    From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as d'Errico et al., 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
d'Errico, F., Vanhaeren, M., Barton, N., Bouzouggar, A., Mienis, H., Richter, D., Hublin, J.-J., McPherron, S. P., & Lozouet, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199, De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, University of Bordeaux, Talence 33405, France;
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-09-22
Volume
106
Issue
38
Pages
16051-16056
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2068587616
Cited by
379
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
FWCI
98.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NER/T/S/2002/00700, NE/E015905/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
personal adornment, Middle Palaeolithic, North Africa, Morocco, behavioral modernity, Last Interglacial, Marine Isotope Stage 5, climate change, cultural transmission, human, dispersal out of Africa, shell modification
MeSH terms
Africa, Animals, Anthropology, Physical, Behavior, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Humans, Population Dynamics, Hominidae, Mediterranean Region, Gastropoda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review