Cited by 43Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyPrimate Behavior and EcologyMorphological variations and asymmetry

Brain Size Growth and Life History in Human Evolution

Leigh, Steven R.·2012·Evolutionary Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11692-012-9168-5

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leigh, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Leigh, Steven R.
Venue
Evolutionary Biology
Published
2012-03-03
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
587-599
ISSN
  • 0071-3260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2845
OpenAlex
W2151321146
Cited by
43
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
brain size evolution, endocranial volume, Neanderthals, Homo erectus, chimpanzees, life history, human evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review