The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The tetranucleotide UCAY directs the specific recognition of RNA by the Nova K-homology 3 domain
Abstract
The Nova family of proteins are target antigens in the autoimmune disorder paraneoplastic opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia and contain K-homology (KH)-type RNA binding domains. The Nova-1 protein has recently been shown to regulate alternative splicing of the α2 glycine receptor subunit pre-mRNA by binding to an intronic element containing repeats of the tetranucleotide UCAU. Here, we have used selection-amplification to demonstrate that the KH3 domain of Nova recognizes a single UCAY element in the context of a 20-base hairpin RNA; the UCAY tetranucleotide is optimally presented as a loop element of the hairpin scaffold and requires protein residues C-terminal to the previously defined KH domain. These results suggest that KH domains in general recognize tetranucleotide motifs and that biological RNA targets of KH domains may use either RNA secondary structure or repeated sequence elements to achieve high affinity and specificity of protein binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These UCAU motifs are recognized as critical regulatory elements and act as potential binding sites for specific RNA binding protein such as the Nova-1 KH-type RNA-binding protein [33,34].”
From The low-density lipoprotein receptor: Emerging post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buckanovich, R., Yang, Y., & Darnell, R. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-03-01114.1996 · Cited by 192
Self-citationWang, X., Kiledjian, M., Weiss, I. M., & Liebhaber, S. A. (1995) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.15.3.1769 · Cited by 192
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1093/nar/21.5.1193 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.00425.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81100-9 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2818 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.11.8.1023 · DOI
- S Arning, P Grüter, G Bilbe, A Kramer RNA 2, 794–810 (1996).
- 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90047-3 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.9.3.269 · DOI
- A V Gamarnik, R Andino RNA 3, 882–892 (1997).
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80241-X · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00110.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70200-3 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.17.4.2158 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90125-I · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng0193-31 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90232-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90077-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01301-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.2200121 · DOI
- 10.1038/346818a0 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.17.6.3194 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80900-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80668-6 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00280a002 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90509-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/13.9.3021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06402.x · DOI
- 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4545-4552.1992 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80221-4 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355838298980499 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2410 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80261-5 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CLIP Identifies Nova-Regulated RNA Networks in the Brain
Ule, J., Jensen, K. B., Ruggiu, M., Mele, A., Ule, A., & Darnell, R. B. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090095 · Cited by 1,120
Self-citationFragile X mental retardation protein targets G quartet mRNAs important for neuronal function
Darnell, J. C., Jensen, K. B., Jin, P., Brown, V., Warren, S. T., & Darnell, R. B. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00566-9 · Cited by 952
Self-citationHITS-CLIP: panoramic views of protein-RNA regulation in living cells
Darnell, R. B. (2010) · WIREs RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.31 · Cited by 382
Self-citationDarnell, J. C., Fraser, C. E., Mostovetsky, O., Stefani, G., Jones, T. A., Eddy, S. R., & Darnell, R. B. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1276805 · Cited by 287
Self-citationAnalysis of CLIP and iCLIP methods for nucleotide-resolution studies of protein-RNA interactions
Sugimoto, Y., König, J., Hussain, S., Zupan, B., Curk, T., Frye, M., & Ule, J. (2012) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-r67 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, K. B., Musunuru, K., Lewis, H. A., Burley, S. K., & Darnell, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Laboratories of Molecular Neuro-Oncology and Molecular Biophysics, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-05-16
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5740-5745
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review