The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management
Open accessAbstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) that exclude fishing have been shown repeatedly to enhance the abundance, size, and diversity of species. These benefits, however, mean little to most marine species, because individual protected areas typically are small. To meet the larger-scale conservation challenges facing ocean ecosystems, several nations are expanding the benefits of individual protected areas by building networks of protected areas. Doing so successfully requires a detailed understanding of the ecological and physical characteristics of ocean ecosystems and the responses of humans to spatial closures. There has been enormous scientific interest in these topics, and frameworks for the design of MPA networks for meeting conservation and fishery management goals are emerging. Persistent in the literature is the perception of an inherent tradeoff between achieving conservation and fishery goals. Through a synthetic analysis across these conservation and bioeconomic studies, we construct guidelines for MPA network design that reduce or eliminate this tradeoff. We present size, spacing, location, and configuration guidelines for designing networks that simultaneously can enhance biological conservation and reduce fishery costs or even increase fishery yields and profits. Indeed, in some settings, a well-designed MPA network is critical to the optimal harvest strategy. When reserves benefit fisheries, the optimal area in reserves is moderately large (mode ≈30%). Assessing network design principals is limited currently by the absence of empirical data from large-scale networks. Emerging networks will soon rectify this constraint.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems
Jackson, J. B. C., Kirby, M. X., Berger, W. H., Bjorndal, K. A., Botsford, L. W., Bourque, B. J., Bradbury, R. H., Cooke, R., Erlandson, J., Estes, J. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059199 · Cited by 6,652
A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems
Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K. A., Kappel, C. V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., Bruno, J. F., Casey, K. S., Ebert, C., Fox, H. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149345 · Cited by 6,627
Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services
Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C., Halpern, B. S., Jackson, J. B. C., Lotze, H. K., Micheli, F., Palumbi, S. R., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132294 · Cited by 4,544
Self-citationRapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities
Myers, R. A., & Worm, B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01610 · Cited by 2,969
AN EQUILIBRIUM THEORY OF INSULAR ZOOGEOGRAPHY
MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1963) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03295.x · Cited by 2,594
Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis
Lester, S., Halpern, B., Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B., Gaines, S., Airamé, S., & Warner, R. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08029 · Cited by 1,447
Self-citationTHE IMPACT OF MARINE RESERVES: DO RESERVES WORK AND DOES RESERVE SIZE MATTER?
Halpern, B. S. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0117:tiomrd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,378
Scaling of connectivity in marine populations
Cowen, R. K., Paris, C. B., & Srinivasan, A. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1122039 · Cited by 1,354
POPULATION GENETICS, DEMOGRAPHIC CONNECTIVITY, AND THE DESIGN OF MARINE RESERVES
Palumbi, S. R. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0146:pgdcat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,207
Self-citationPROPAGULE DISPERSAL IN MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS: A COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE
Kinlan, B. P., & Gaines, S. D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/01-0622 · Cited by 1,039
Self-citation
Cited by
Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks
Baguette, M., Blanchet, S., Legrand, D., Stevens, V. M., & Turlure, C. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12000 · Cited by 714
Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation
Allen, A. M., & Singh, N. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00155 · Cited by 441
Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: Review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues
Katsanevakis, S., Stelzenmüller, V., South, A., Sørensen, T. K., Jones, P. J. S., Kerr, S., Badalamenti, F., Anagnostou, C., Breen, P., Chust, G., et al. (2011) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.09.002 · Cited by 425
Effective Coverage Targets for Ocean Protection
O'Leary, B. C., Winther‐Janson, M., Bainbridge, J. M., Aitken, J., Hawkins, J. P., & Roberts, C. M. (2016) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12247 · Cited by 299
Lewison, R., Hobday, A. J., Maxwell, S., Hazen, E., Hartog, J. R., Dunn, D. C., Briscoe, D., Fossette, S., O'Keefe, C. E., Barnes, M., et al. (2015) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv018 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaines, S. D., White, C., Carr, M. H., & Palumbi, S. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-03-03
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 18286-18293
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2005099670
- Cited by
- 888
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 43.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0906473107
- The paper
- Gaines, S. D., White, C., Carr, M. H., & Palumbi, S. R. (2010). Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906473107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
