The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuronal couplings between retinal ganglion cells inferred by efficient inverse statistical physics methods
Open accessAbstract
Complexity of neural systems often makes impracticable explicit measurements of all interactions between their constituents. Inverse statistical physics approaches, which infer effective couplings between neurons from their spiking activity, have been so far hindered by their computational complexity. Here, we present 2 complementary, computationally efficient inverse algorithms based on the Ising and “leaky integrate-and-fire” models. We apply those algorithms to reanalyze multielectrode recordings in the salamander retina in darkness and under random visual stimulus. We find strong positive couplings between nearby ganglion cells common to both stimuli, whereas long-range couplings appear under random stimulus only. The uncertainty on the inferred couplings due to limitations in the recordings (duration, small area covered on the retina) is discussed. Our methods will allow real-time evaluation of couplings for large assemblies of neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic predictive coding by the retina
Hosoya, T., Baccus, S. A., & Meister, M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03689 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality?
Mora, T., & Bialek, W. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-011-0229-4 · Cited by 734
Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models
Ekeberg, M., Lövkvist, C., Lan, Y., Weigt, M., & Aurell, E. (2013) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.87.012707 · Cited by 661
Data based identification and prediction of nonlinear and complex dynamical systems
Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y.-C., & Grebogi, C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.004 · Cited by 299
Inverse statistical problems: from the inverse Ising problem to data science
Nguyen, H. C., Zecchina, R., & Berg, J. (2017) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2017.1341604 · Cited by 258
Learning probabilistic neural representations with randomly connected circuits
Maoz, O., Tkačik, G., Esteki, M. S., Kiani, R., & Schneidman, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1912804117 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Cocco, S., Leibler, S., & Monasson, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-08-18
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 14058-14062
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2160903198
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuronal couplings between retinal ganglion cells inferred by efficient inverse statistical physics methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0906705106
- The paper
- Cocco, S., Leibler, S., & Monasson, R. (2009). Neuronal couplings between retinal ganglion cells inferred by efficient inverse statistical physics methods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906705106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.