Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective N -acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase inhibition reveals a key role for endogenous palmitoylethanolamide in inflammation

Open access
Solorzano, Carlos, Zhu, Chenggang, Battista, Natalia, Astarita, Giuseppe, Lodola, Alessio, Rivara, Silvia, Mor, Marco, Russo, Roberto, Maccarrone, Mauro, Antonietti, Francesca, Duranti, Andrea, Tontini, Andrea, Cuzzocrea, Salvatore, Tarzia, Giorgio, Piomelli, Daniele·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Identifying points of control in inflammation is essential to discovering safe and effective antiinflammatory medicines. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is a naturally occurring lipid amide that, when administered as a drug, inhibits inflammatory responses by engaging peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α). PEA is preferentially hydrolyzed by the cysteine amidase N -acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase (NAAA), which is highly expressed in macrophages. Here we report the discovery of a potent and selective NAAA inhibitor, N -[(3 S )-2-oxo-3-oxetanyl]-3-phenylpropanamide [( S )-OOPP], and show that this inhibitor increases PEA levels in activated leukocytes and blunts responses induced by inflammatory stimuli both in vitro and in vivo. These effects are stereoselective, mimicked by exogenous PEA, and abolished by PPAR-α deletion. ( S )-OOPP also attenuates inflammation and tissue damage and improves recovery of motor function in mice subjected to spinal cord trauma. The results suggest that PEA activation of PPAR-α in leukocytes serves as an early stop signal that contrasts the progress of inflammation. The PEA-hydrolyzing amidase NAAA may provide a previously undescribed target for antiinflammatory medicines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0907417106

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Solorzano, C., Zhu, C., Battista, N., Astarita, G., Lodola, A., Rivara, S., Mor, M., Russo, R., Maccarrone, M., Antonietti, F., Duranti, A., Tontini, A., Cuzzocrea, S., Tarzia, G., & Piomelli, D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-12-08
Volume
106
Issue
49
Pages
20966-20971
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2095720174
Cited by
223
References
10
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective N -acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase inhibition reveals a key role for endogenous palmitoylethanolamide in inflammation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0907417106
The paper
Solorzano, C., Zhu, C., Battista, N., Astarita, G., Lodola, A., Rivara, S., Mor, M., Russo, R., Maccarrone, M., Antonietti, F., Duranti, A., Tontini, A., Cuzzocrea, S., Tarzia, G., & Piomelli, D. (2009). Selective N -acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase inhibition reveals a key role for endogenous palmitoylethanolamide in inflammation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907417106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.