The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecology of the rare microbial biosphere of the Arctic Ocean
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the role of microbes in the oceans has focused on taxa that occur in high abundance; yet most of the marine microbial diversity is largely determined by a long tail of low-abundance taxa. This rare biosphere may have a cosmopolitan distribution because of high dispersal and low loss rates, and possibly represents a source of phylotypes that become abundant when environmental conditions change. However, the true ecological role of rare marine microorganisms is still not known. Here, we use pyrosequencing to describe the structure and composition of the rare biosphere and to test whether it represents cosmopolitan taxa or whether, similar to abundant phylotypes, the rare community has a biogeography. Our examination of 740,353 16S rRNA gene sequences from 32 bacterial and archaeal communities from various locations of the Arctic Ocean showed that rare phylotypes did not have a cosmopolitan distribution but, rather, followed patterns similar to those of the most abundant members of the community and of the entire community. The abundance distributions of rare and abundant phylotypes were different, following a log-series and log-normal model, respectively, and the taxonomic composition of the rare biosphere was similar to the composition of the abundant phylotypes. We conclude that the rare biosphere has a biogeography and that its tremendous diversity is most likely subjected to ecological processes such as selection, speciation, and extinction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dethlefsen, L., Huse, S., Sogin, M. L., & Relman, D. A. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060280 · Cited by 2,361
Cited by
Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy
Lennon, J. T., & Jones, S. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2504 · Cited by 1,883
Pedrós-Alió, C. (2012) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100948 · Cited by 760
The biogeography of abundant and rare bacterioplankton in the lakes and reservoirs of China
Liu, L., Yang, J., Yu, Z., & Wilkinson, D. M. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.29 · Cited by 572
Schmitt, S., Tsai, P., Bell, J., Fromont, J., Ilan, M., Lindquist, N., Perez, T., Rodrigo, A., Schupp, P. J., Vacelet, J., et al. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.116 · Cited by 531
Marine Microbial Assemblages on Microplastics: Diversity, Adaptation, and Role in Degradation
Oberbeckmann, S., & Labrenz, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010633 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Galand, P. E., Casamayor, E. O., Kirchman, D. L., & Lovejoy, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-12-29
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 22427-22432
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1965423747
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecology of the rare microbial biosphere of the Arctic Ocean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0908284106
- The paper
- Galand, P. E., Casamayor, E. O., Kirchman, D. L., & Lovejoy, C. (2009). Ecology of the rare microbial biosphere of the Arctic Ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908284106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.