The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wolbachia as a bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualist
Open accessAbstract
Many insects are dependent on bacterial symbionts that provide essential nutrients (ex. aphid– Buchnera and tsetse– Wiglesworthia associations), wherein the symbionts are harbored in specific cells called bacteriocytes that constitute a symbiotic organ bacteriome. Facultative and parasitic bacterial symbionts like Wolbachia have been regarded as evolutionarily distinct from such obligate nutritional mutualists. However, we discovered that, in the bedbug Cimex lectularius , Wolbachia resides in a bacteriome and appears to be an obligate nutritional mutualist. Two bacterial symbionts, a Wolbachia strain and an unnamed γ-proteobacterium, were identified from different strains of the bedbug. The Wolbachia symbiont was detected from all of the insects examined whereas the γ-proteobacterium was found in a part of them. The Wolbachia symbiont was specifically localized in the bacteriomes and vertically transmitted via the somatic stem cell niche of germalia to oocytes, infecting the incipient symbiotic organ at an early stage of the embryogenesis. Elimination of the Wolbachia symbiont resulted in retarded growth and sterility of the host insect. These deficiencies were rescued by oral supplementation of B vitamins, confirming the essential nutritional role of the symbiont for the host. The estimated genome size of the Wolbachia symbiont was around 1.3 Mb, which was almost equivalent to the genome sizes of parasitic Wolbachia strains of other insects. These results indicate that bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualism can evolve from facultative and prevalent microbial associates like Wolbachia , highlighting a previously unknown aspect of the parasitism-mutualism evolutionary continuum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models
Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 · Cited by 29,077
Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology
Werren, J. H., Baldo, L., & Clark, M. E. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1969 · Cited by 2,819
Genomics and Evolution of Heritable Bacterial Symbionts
Moran, N. A., McCutcheon, J. P., & Nakabachi, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119 · Cited by 1,737
Hilgenboecker, K., Hammerstein, P., Schlattmann, P., Telschow, A., & Werren, J. H. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01110.x · Cited by 1,334
Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS
Shigenobu, S., Watanabe, H., Hattori, M., Sakaki, Y., & Ishikawa, H. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35024074 · Cited by 1,309
Teixeira, L., Ferreira, Á., & Ashburner, M. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000002 · Cited by 1,214
Wolbachia and Virus Protection in Insects
Hedges, L. M., Brownlie, J. C., O'Neill, S. L., & Johnson, K. N. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162418 · Cited by 1,107
Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms
Brooks, M. A. (1966) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/0022-2011(66)90065-6 · Cited by 1,106
Multilocus Sequence Typing System for the Endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis
Baldo, L., Dunning Hotopp, J. C., Jolley, K. A., Bordenstein, S. R., Biber, S. A., Choudhury, R. R., Hayashi, C., Maiden, M. C. J., Tettelin, H., & Werren, J. H. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00731-06 · Cited by 870
Cited by
The gut microbiota of insects – diversity in structure and function
Engel, P., & Moran, N. A. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12025 · Cited by 2,595
Gut Microbiotas and Host Evolution: Scaling Up Symbiosis
Shapira, M. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.006 · Cited by 448
Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation
Toft, C., & Andersson, S. G. E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2798 · Cited by 432
Wolbachia and the biological control of mosquito‐borne disease
Iturbe‐Ormaetxe, I., Walker, T., & O' Neill, S. L. (2011) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2011.84 · Cited by 419
Bedbugs and infectious diseases.
Delaunay, P., Blanc, V., Del Giudice, P., Levy-Bencheton, A., Chosidow, O., Marty, P., & Brouqui, P. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciq102 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosokawa, T., Koga, R., Kikuchi, Y., Meng, X.-Y., & Fukatsu, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-12-22
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 769-774
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2093172628
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 30.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wolbachia as a bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualist. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0911476107
- The paper
- Hosokawa, T., Koga, R., Kikuchi, Y., Meng, X.-Y., & Fukatsu, T. (2010). Wolbachia as a bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualist. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911476107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.