Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A pathway-based classification of human breast cancer

Open access
Gatza, Michael L., Lucas, Joseph E., Barry, William T., Kim, Jong Wook, Wang, Quanli, D. Crawford, Matthew, B. Datto, Michael, Kelley, Michael, Mathey-Prevot, Bernard, Potti, Anil, Nevins, Joseph R.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The hallmark of human cancer is heterogeneity, reflecting the complexity and variability of the vast array of somatic mutations acquired during oncogenesis. An ability to dissect this heterogeneity, to identify subgroups that represent common mechanisms of disease, will be critical to understanding the complexities of genetic alterations and to provide a framework to develop rational therapeutic strategies. Here, we describe a classification scheme for human breast cancer making use of patterns of pathway activity to build on previous subtype characterizations using intrinsic gene expression signatures, to provide a functional interpretation of the gene expression data that can be linked to therapeutic options. We show that the identified subgroups provide a robust mechanism for classifying independent samples, identifying tumors that share patterns of pathway activity and exhibit similar clinical and biological properties, including distinct patterns of chromosomal alterations that were not evident in the heterogeneous total population of tumors. We propose that this classification scheme provides a basis for understanding the complex mechanisms of oncogenesis that give rise to these tumors and to identify rational opportunities for combination therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0912708107

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Gatza, M. L., Lucas, J. E., Barry, W. T., Kim, J. W., Wang, Q., D. Crawford, M., B. Datto, M., Kelley, M., Mathey-Prevot, B., Potti, A., & Nevins, J. R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-03-24
Volume
107
Issue
15
Pages
6994-6999
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2120261416
Cited by
347
References
45
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A pathway-based classification of human breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0912708107
The paper
Gatza, M. L., Lucas, J. E., Barry, W. T., Kim, J. W., Wang, Q., D. Crawford, M., B. Datto, M., Kelley, M., Mathey-Prevot, B., Potti, A., & Nevins, J. R. (2010). A pathway-based classification of human breast cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912708107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.