The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome expression analysis of Anopheles gambiae : Responses to injury, bacterial challenge, and malaria infection
Open accessAbstract
The complex gene expression responses of Anopheles gambiae to microbial and malaria challenges, injury, and oxidative stress (in the mosquito and/or a cultured cell line) were surveyed by using cDNA microarrays constructed from an EST-clone collection. The expression profiles were broadly subdivided into induced and down-regulated gene clusters. Gram + and Gram − bacteria and microbial elicitors up-regulated a diverse set of genes, many belonging to the immunity class, and the response to malaria partially overlapped with this response. Oxidative stress activated a distinctive set of genes, mainly implicated in oxidoreductive processes. Injury up- and down-regulated gene clusters also were distinctive, prominently implicating glycolysis-related genes and citric acid cycle/oxidative phosphorylation/redox-mitochondrial functions, respectively. Cross-comparison of in vivo and in vitro responses indicated the existence of tightly coregulated gene groups that may correspond to gene pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Cited by
Invertebrate immune systems – not homogeneous, not simple, not well understood
Loker, E. S., Adema, C. M., Zhang, S., & Kepler, T. B. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0117.x · Cited by 718
Blandin, S., Shiao, S.-H., Moita, L. F., Janse, C. J., Waters, A. P., Kafatos, F. C., & Levashina, E. A. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00173-4 · Cited by 606
Self-citationComparative Genome and Proteome Analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster
Zdobnov, E. M., von Mering, C., Letunic, I., Torrents, D., Suyama, M., Copley, R. R., Christophides, G. K., Thomasova, D., Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077061 · Cited by 553
Self-citationDong, Y., Taylor, H. E., & Dimopoulos, G. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040229 · Cited by 465
Self-citationEffects of Mosquito Genes on Plasmodium Development
Osta, M. A., Christophides, G. K., & Kafatos, F. C. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091789 · Cited by 411
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimopoulos, G., Christophides, G. K., Meister, S., Schultz, J., White, K. P., Barillas-Mury, C., & Kafatos, F. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-06-19
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 8814-8819
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1985376893
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome expression analysis of Anopheles gambiae : Responses to injury, bacterial challenge, and malaria infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.092274999
- The paper
- Dimopoulos, G., Christophides, G. K., Meister, S., Schultz, J., White, K. P., Barillas-Mury, C., & Kafatos, F. C. (2002). Genome expression analysis of Anopheles gambiae : Responses to injury, bacterial challenge, and malaria infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.092274999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
