The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea
Open accessAbstract
Molecular dynamics simulations of the protein chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 in 8 M urea at 60°C were undertaken to investigate the molecular basis of chemical denaturation. The protein unfolded rapidly under these conditions, but it retained its native structure in a control simulation in water at the same temperature. The overall process of unfolding in urea was similar to that observed in thermal denaturation simulations above the protein's T m of 75°C. The first step in unfolding was expansion of the hydrophobic core. Then, the core was solvated by water and later by urea. The denatured structures in both urea and at high temperature contained residual native helical structure, whereas the β-structure was completely disrupted. The average residence time for urea around hydrophilic groups was six times greater than around hydrophobic residues and in all cases greater than the corresponding water residence times. Water self-diffusion was reduced 40% in 8 M urea. Urea altered water structure and dynamics, thereby diminishing the hydrophobic effect and encouraging solvation of hydrophobic groups. In addition, through urea's weakening of water structure, water became free to compete with intraprotein interactions. Urea also interacted directly with polar residues and the peptide backbone, thereby stabilizing nonnative conformations. These simulations suggest that urea denatures proteins via both direct and indirect mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952
Cited by
Water as an active constituent in cell biology
Ball, P. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068037a · Cited by 2,177
The present view of the mechanism of protein folding
Daggett, V., & Fersht, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1126 · Cited by 398
Self-citationTang, R., Kim, C. S., Solfiell, D. J., Rana, S., Mout, R., Velázquez-Delgado, E. M., Chompoosor, A., Jeong, Y., Yan, B., Zhu, Z.-J., et al. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn402753y · Cited by 188
Quantitative proteomics reveals distinct composition of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease
Xiong, F., Ge, W., & Ma, C. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.10.006 · Cited by 133
Modulating Molecular Interactions in Pea Protein to Improve Its Functional Properties
Shen, Y., Du, Z., Wu, X., & Li, Y. (2022) · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100313 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennion, B. J., & Daggett, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-04-17
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5142-5147
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2106043217
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0930122100
- The paper
- Bennion, B. J., & Daggett, V. (2003). The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0930122100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.