The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression
Open accessAbstract
Although distinct pathological stages of breast cancer have been described, the molecular differences among these stages are largely unknown. Here, through the combined use of laser capture microdissection and DNA microarrays, we have generated in situ gene expression profiles of the premalignant, preinvasive, and invasive stages of human breast cancer. Our data reveal extensive similarities at the transcriptome level among the distinct stages of progression and suggest that gene expression alterations conferring the potential for invasive growth are already present in the preinvasive stages. In contrast to tumor stage, different tumor grades are associated with distinct gene expression signatures. Furthermore, a subset of genes associated with high tumor grade is quantitatively correlated with the transition from preinvasive to invasive growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
Cited by
Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models
Weigelt, B., Peterse, J. L., & van't Veer, L. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1670 · Cited by 2,232
The Hox genes and their roles in oncogenesis
Shah, N., & Sukumar, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2826 · Cited by 835
Coexpression Analysis of Human Genes Across Many Microarray Data Sets
Lee, H. K., Hsu, A. K., Sajdak, J., Qin, J., & Pavlidis, P. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1910904 · Cited by 770
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast
Burstein, H. J., Polyak, K., Wong, J. S., Lester, S. C., & Kaelin, C. M. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra031301 · Cited by 759
DeYoung, M. P., Horak, P., Sofer, A., Sgroi, D., & Ellisen, L. W. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1617608 · Cited by 710
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, X.-J., Salunga, R., Tuggle, J. T., Gaudet, J., Enright, E., McQuary, P., Payette, T., Pistone, M., Stecker, K., Zhang, B. M., Zhou, Y.-X., Varnholt, H., Smith, B., Gadd, M., Chatfield, E., Kessler, J., Baer, T. M., Erlander, M. G., & Sgroi, D. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-04-24
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5974-5979
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2103543394
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0931261100
- The paper
- Ma, X.-J., Salunga, R., Tuggle, J. T., Gaudet, J., Enright, E., McQuary, P., Payette, T., Pistone, M., Stecker, K., Zhang, B. M., Zhou, Y.-X., Varnholt, H., Smith, B., Gadd, M., Chatfield, E., Kessler, J., Baer, T. M., Erlander, M. G., & Sgroi, D. C. (2003). Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0931261100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
