Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bombesin functionalized gold nanoparticles show in vitro and in vivo cancer receptor specificity

Open access
Chanda, Nripen, Kattumuri, Vijaya, Shukla, Ravi, Zambre, Ajit, Katti, Kavita, Upendran, Anandhi, Kulkarni, Rajesh R., Kan, Para, Fent, Genevieve M., Casteel, Stan W., Smith, C. Jeffrey, Boote, Evan, Robertson, J. David, Cutler, Cathy, Lever, John R., Katti, Kattesh V., Kannan, Raghuraman·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Development of cancer receptor-specific gold nanoparticles will allow efficient targeting/optimum retention of engineered gold nanoparticles within tumors and thus provide synergistic advantages in oncology as it relates to molecular imaging and therapy. Bombesin (BBN) peptides have demonstrated high affinity toward gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptors in vivo that are overexpressed in prostate, breast, and small-cell lung carcinoma. We have synthesized a library of GRP receptor-avid nanoplatforms by conjugating gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with BBN peptides. Cellular interactions and binding affinities (IC 50 ) of AuNP–BBN conjugates toward GRP receptors on human prostate cancer cells have been investigated in detail. In vivo studies using AuNP–BBN and its radiolabeled surrogate 198 AuNP–BBN, exhibiting high binding affinity (IC 50 in microgram ranges), provide unequivocal evidence that AuNP–BBN constructs are GRP-receptor-specific showing accumulation with high selectivity in GRP-receptor-rich pancreatic acne in normal mice and also in tumors in prostate-tumor-bearing, severe combined immunodeficient mice. The i.p. mode of delivery has been found to be efficient as AuNP–BBN conjugates showed reduced RES organ uptake with concomitant increase in uptake at tumor targets. The selective uptake of this new generation of GRP-receptor-specific AuNP–BBN peptide analogs has demonstrated realistic clinical potential in molecular imaging via x-ray computed tomography techniques as the contrast numbers in prostate tumor sites are severalfold higher as compared to the pretreatment group (Hounsfield unit = 150).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1002143107

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Chanda, N., Kattumuri, V., Shukla, R., Zambre, A., Katti, K., Upendran, A., Kulkarni, R. R., Kan, P., Fent, G. M., Casteel, S. W., Smith, C. J., Boote, E., Robertson, J. D., Cutler, C., Lever, J. R., Katti, K. V., & Kannan, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-04-21
Volume
107
Issue
19
Pages
8760-8765
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2029804518
Cited by
321
References
23
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bombesin functionalized gold nanoparticles show in vitro and in vivo cancer receptor specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1002143107
The paper
Chanda, N., Kattumuri, V., Shukla, R., Zambre, A., Katti, K., Upendran, A., Kulkarni, R. R., Kan, P., Fent, G. M., Casteel, S. W., Smith, C. J., Boote, E., Robertson, J. D., Cutler, C., Lever, J. R., Katti, K. V., & Kannan, R. (2010). Bombesin functionalized gold nanoparticles show in vitro and in vivo cancer receptor specificity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002143107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.