Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay redefines “undetectable” PSA and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Open access
Thaxton, C. Shad, Elghanian, Robert, Thomas, Audrey D., Stoeva, Savka I., Lee, Jae-Seung, Smith, Norm D., Schaeffer, Anthony J., Klocker, Helmut, Horninger, Wolfgang, Bartsch, Georg, Mirkin, Chad A.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We report the development of a previously undescribed gold nanoparticle bio-barcode assay probe for the detection of prostate specific antigen (PSA) at 330 fg/mL, automation of the assay, and the results of a clinical pilot study designed to assess the ability of the assay to detect PSA in the serum of 18 men who have undergone radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Due to a lack of sensitivity, available PSA immunoassays are often not capable of detecting PSA in the serum of men after radical prostatectomy. This new bio-barcode PSA assay is ≈300 times more sensitive than commercial immunoassays. Significantly, with the barcode assay, every patient in this cohort had a measurable serum PSA level after radical prostatectomy. Patients were separated into categories based on PSA levels as a function of time. One group of patients showed low levels of PSA with no significant increase with time and did not recur. Others showed, at some point postprostatectomy, rising PSA levels. The majority recurred. Therefore, this new ultrasensitive assay points to significant possible outcomes: ( i ) The ability to tell patients, who have undetectable PSA levels with conventional assays, but detectable and nonrising levels with the barcode assay, that their cancer will not recur. ( ii ) The ability to assign recurrence earlier because of the ability to measure increasing levels of PSA before conventional tools can make such assignments. ( iii ) The ability to use PSA levels that are not detectable with conventional assays to follow the response of patients to adjuvant or salvage therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0904719106

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Thaxton, C. S., Elghanian, R., Thomas, A. D., Stoeva, S. I., Lee, J.-S., Smith, N. D., Schaeffer, A. J., Klocker, H., Horninger, W., Bartsch, G., & Mirkin, C. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-11-03
Volume
106
Issue
44
Pages
18437-18442
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2145363935
Cited by
388
References
3
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay redefines “undetectable” PSA and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0904719106
The paper
Thaxton, C. S., Elghanian, R., Thomas, A. D., Stoeva, S. I., Lee, J.-S., Smith, N. D., Schaeffer, A. J., Klocker, H., Horninger, W., Bartsch, G., & Mirkin, C. A. (2009). Nanoparticle-based bio-barcode assay redefines “undetectable” PSA and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904719106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.