Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrocarbon double-stapling remedies the proteolytic instability of a lengthy peptide therapeutic

Open access
Bird, Gregory H., Madani, Navid, Perry, Alisa F., Princiotto, Amy M., Supko, Jeffrey G., He, Xiaoying, Gavathiotis, Evripidis, Sodroski, Joseph G., Walensky, Loren D.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The pharmacologic utility of lengthy peptides can be hindered by loss of bioactive structure and rapid proteolysis, which limits bioavailability. For example, enfuvirtide (Fuzeon, T20, DP178), a 36-amino acid peptide that inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection by effectively targeting the viral fusion apparatus, has been relegated to a salvage treatment option mostly due to poor in vivo stability and lack of oral bioavailability. To overcome the proteolytic shortcomings of long peptides as therapeutics, we examined the biophysical, biological, and pharmacologic impact of inserting all-hydrocarbon staples into an HIV-1 fusion inhibitor. We find that peptide double-stapling confers striking protease resistance that translates into markedly improved pharmacokinetic properties, including oral absorption. We determined that the hydrocarbon staples create a proteolytic shield by combining reinforcement of overall α-helical structure, which slows the kinetics of proteolysis, with complete blockade of peptide cleavage at constrained sites in the immediate vicinity of the staple. Importantly, double-stapling also optimizes the antiviral activity of HIV-1 fusion peptides and the antiproteolytic feature extends to other therapeutic peptide templates, such as the diabetes drug exenatide (Byetta). Thus, hydrocarbon double-stapling may unlock the therapeutic potential of natural bioactive polypeptides by transforming them into structurally fortified agents with enhanced bioavailability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1002713107

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Bird, G. H., Madani, N., Perry, A. F., Princiotto, A. M., Supko, J. G., He, X., Gavathiotis, E., Sodroski, J. G., & Walensky, L. D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-07-21
Volume
107
Issue
32
Pages
14093-14098
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2014171031
Cited by
347
References
35
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrocarbon double-stapling remedies the proteolytic instability of a lengthy peptide therapeutic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1002713107
The paper
Bird, G. H., Madani, N., Perry, A. F., Princiotto, A. M., Supko, J. G., He, X., Gavathiotis, E., Sodroski, J. G., & Walensky, L. D. (2010). Hydrocarbon double-stapling remedies the proteolytic instability of a lengthy peptide therapeutic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002713107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.