Using deep sequencing to characterize the biophysical mechanism of a transcriptional regulatory sequence
Open accessAbstract
Cells use protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions to regulate transcription. A biophysical understanding of this process has, however, been limited by the lack of methods for quantitatively characterizing the interactions that occur at specific promoters and enhancers in living cells. Here we show how such biophysical information can be revealed by a simple experiment in which a library of partially mutated regulatory sequences are partitioned according to their in vivo transcriptional activities and then sequenced en masse. Computational analysis of the sequence data produced by this experiment can provide precise quantitative information about how the regulatory proteins at a specific arrangement of binding sites work together to regulate transcription. This ability to reliably extract precise information about regulatory biophysics in the face of experimental noise is made possible by a recently identified relationship between likelihood and mutual information. Applying our experimental and computational techniques to the Escherichia coli lac promoter, we demonstrate the ability to identify regulatory protein binding sites de novo, determine the sequence-dependent binding energy of the proteins that bind these sites, and, importantly, measure the in vivo interaction energy between RNA polymerase and a DNA-bound transcription factor. Our approach provides a generally applicable method for characterizing the biophysical basis of transcriptional regulation by a specified regulatory sequence. The principles of our method can also be applied to a wide range of other problems in molecular biology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FACS-based assays enable functional classification of variant libraries by sorting cells into bins based on fluorescence intensity.
“FACS-based assays enable functional classification of variant libraries by sorting cells into different bins based on fluorescence intensity (91).”
From Massively parallel functional genomic assays in endocrinology: from promise to delivery (2026) · cites this paper as [91]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [22]Cover TM, Thomas JA (1991) Elements of information theory (Wiley, New York, NY).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution
de Visser, J. A. G. M., & Krug, J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3744 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Melnikov, A., Murugan, A., Zhang, X., Tesileanu, T., Wang, L., Rogov, P., Feizi, S., Gnirke, A., Callan, C. G., Kinney, J. B., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2137 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Self-citationEquitability, mutual information, and the maximal information coefficient
Kinney, J. B., & Atwal, G. S. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1309933111 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity
DREAM5 Consortium, Weirauch, M. T., Cote, A., Norel, R., Annala, M., Zhao, Y., Riley, T. R., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Cokelaer, T., Vedenko, A., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2486 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Inoue, F., Kircher, M., Martin, B., Cooper, G. M., Witten, D. M., McManus, M. T., Ahituv, N., & Shendure, J. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.212092.116 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Decoding enhancers using massively parallel reporter assays
Inoue, F., & Ahituv, N. (2015) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.06.005 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
LaFleur, T. L., Hossain, A., & Salis, H. M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32829-5 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
The power of multiplexed functional analysis of genetic variants
Gasperini, M., Starita, L., & Shendure, J. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.135 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Maricque, B. B., Chaudhari, H. G., & Cohen, B. A. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4285 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Quantitative Control for Stoichiometric Protein Synthesis
Taggart, J. C., Lalanne, J.-B., & Li, G.-W. (2021) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-041921-012646 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Gauge fixing for sequence-function relationships
Posfai, A., Zhou, J., McCandlish, D. M., & Kinney, J. B. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.12.593772 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationLeveraging pre-trained AI models for robust promoter sequence design in synthetic biology
Yang, G., Chen, Y., Guo, Q., Li, X., & Zhou, Z. (2026) · Biophysics Reports · doi:10.52601/bpr.2025.240033 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Massively parallel functional genomic assays in endocrinology: from promise to delivery
Xu, J., Aslanzadeh, V., Kudla, G., & Semple, R. K. (2026) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-25-0134
- Authors
- Kinney, J. B., Murugan, A., Callan, C. G., & Cox, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-05-03
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9158-9163
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2889059
- OpenAlex
- W2159933659
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0650617)
- U.S. Department of Energy (FG0291ER40671, DE‐FG02‐, DEFG0291ER40671)
- Simons Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (GM071508)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM071508, GM078591, R01GM078591, P50GM071508)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- transcriptional regulation, protein-DNA interactions, RNA polymerase, transcription factor binding sites, lac promoter, Escherichia coli, binding energy, enhancers, protein-protein interaction
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Biophysics, Escherichia coli, Flow Cytometry, Gene Expression Regulation, Lac Operon, Models, Biological, Molecular Sequence Data, Monte Carlo Method, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Thermodynamics, Likelihood Functions, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, Green Fluorescent Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review