Cited by 711Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Systematic dissection and optimization of inducible enhancers in human cells using a massively parallel reporter assay

Melnikov, Alexandre, Murugan, Anand, Zhang, Xiaolan, Tesileanu, Tiberiu, Wang, Li, Rogov, Peter, Feizi, Soheil, Gnirke, Andreas +5 more·2012·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Learning to read and write the transcriptional regulatory code is of central importance to progress in genetic analysis and engineering. Here we describe a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) that facilitates the systematic dissection of transcriptional regulatory elements. In MPRA, microarray-synthesized DNA regulatory elements and unique sequence tags are cloned into plasmids to generate a library of reporter constructs. These constructs are transfected into cells and tag expression is assayed by high-throughput sequencing. We apply MPRA to compare >27,000 variants of two inducible enhancers in human cells: a synthetic cAMP-regulated enhancer and the virus-inducible interferon-β enhancer. We first show that the resulting data define accurate maps of functional transcription factor binding sites in both enhancers at single-nucleotide resolution. We then use the data to train quantitative sequence-activity models (QSAMs) of the two enhancers. We show that QSAMs from two cellular states can be combined to design enhancer variants that optimize potentially conflicting objectives, such as maximizing induced activity while minimizing basal activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.2137

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A major advantage of MPRAs is that sequences to be tested can simply be synthesized, enabling straightforward saturation mutagenesis and programming synthetic enhancers.

    “A major advantage of MPRAs is that sequences to be tested can simply be synthesized, enabling straightforward saturation mutagenesis [G] of enhancers67,184,185 as well as programming synthetic enhancers to inform modelling of their properties186,187.”
  • Current CRISPR sgRNA libraries can be decoded directly via the CROP-seq vector, while other perturbations, such as ORFs or non-coding elements, can be tagged with short barcodes.

    “Existing CRISPR sgRNA libraries can be read out directly (using the CROP-seq vector) while other perturbations (e.g., ORFs, non-coding sequences) can be paired with short barcodes (Melnikov et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2011).”

    From Optical Pooled Screens in Human Cells (2019) · cites this paper as Melnikov et al., 2012

  • Massively parallel reporter assays and CRISPR genome editing have matured rapidly to enable functional characterization of targeted sequence perturbations at scale.

    “To address this, there has been rapid maturation of technologies, such as massively parallel reporter assays121–123 and CRISPR genome editing, to support functional characterization of targeted sequence perturbations at scale.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [122]

  • The PESCA platform extends previous paralleled reporter assays carried out using bulk tissue or sorted cells by including a single-cell RNA-seq-based readout to evaluate the cell-type-specificity of gene expression.

    “The PESCA platform extends previous paralleled reporter assays (Hartl et al., 2017; Inoue et al., 2017; Melnikov et al., 2012; Murtha et al., 2014; Patwardhan et al., 2012; Shen et al., 2016) carried out using bulk tissue or sorted cells by including a single-cell RNA-seq-based readout (Cao et al., 2017; Hrvatin et al., 2018; Klein et al., 2015; Macosko et al., 2015; Rosenberg et al., 2018; Stroud”

    From A scalable platform for the development of cell-type-specific viral drivers (2019) · cites this paper as Melnikov et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Bishop CM Pattern recognition and machine learning 2006 Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melnikov, A., Murugan, A., Zhang, X., Tesileanu, T., Wang, L., Rogov, P., Feizi, S., Gnirke, A., Callan, C. G., Kinney, J. B., Kellis, M., Lander, E. S., & Mikkelsen, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Mikkelsen, Tarjei S
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2012-02-26
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
271-277
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2023386301
Cited by
711
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 22
FWCI
18.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG004037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
enhancers, massively parallel reporter assay, synthetic enhancers, transcription factor binding sites, transcriptional regulation, human cells
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Biological Assay, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Mutagenesis, Sequence Alignment, Genes, Reporter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review