The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptation to herbivory by the Tammar wallaby includes bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles different from other herbivores
Open accessAbstract
Metagenomic and bioinformatic approaches were used to characterize plant biomass conversion within the foregut microbiome of Australia's “model” marsupial, the Tammar wallaby ( Macropus eugenii ). Like the termite hindgut and bovine rumen, key enzymes and modular structures characteristic of the “free enzyme” and “cellulosome” paradigms of cellulose solubilization remain either poorly represented or elusive to capture by shotgun sequencing methods. Instead, multigene polysaccharide utilization loci-like systems coupled with genes encoding β-1,4-endoglucanases and β-1,4-endoxylanases—which have not been previously encountered in metagenomic datasets—were identified, as were a diverse set of glycoside hydrolases targeting noncellulosic polysaccharides. Furthermore, both rrs gene and other phylogenetic analyses confirmed that unique clades of the Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidales, and Gammaproteobacteria are predominant in the Tammar foregut microbiome. Nucleotide composition-based sequence binning facilitated the assemblage of more than two megabase pairs of genomic sequence for one of the novel Lachnospiraceae clades (WG-2). These analyses show that WG-2 possesses numerous glycoside hydrolases targeting noncellulosic polysaccharides. These collective data demonstrate that Australian macropods not only harbor unique bacterial lineages underpinning plant biomass conversion, but their repertoire of glycoside hydrolases is distinct from those of the microbiomes of higher termites and the bovine rumen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Self-citationEvolution of mammals and their gut microbes
Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ramey, R. R., Bircher, J. S., Schlegel, M. L., Tucker, T. A., Schrenzel, M. D., Knight, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155725 · Cited by 3,747
A Genomic View of the Human- Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Symbiosis
Xu, J., Bjursell, M. K., Himrod, J., Deng, S., Carmichael, L. K., Chiang, H. C., Hooper, L. V., & Gordon, J. I. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080029 · Cited by 1,353
New substrates for TonB-dependent transport: do we only see the ‘tip of the iceberg’?
Schauer, K., Rodionov, D. A., & de Reuse, H. (2008) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.012 · Cited by 360
Cited by
Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen
Hess, M., Sczyrba, A., Egan, R., Kim, T.-W., Chokhawala, H., Schroth, G., Luo, S., Clark, D. S., Chen, F., Zhang, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200387 · Cited by 1,319
Self-citationFunctional diversity within the simple gut microbiota of the honey bee
Engel, P., Martinson, V. G., & Moran, N. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1202970109 · Cited by 874
Widespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride
Baker, J. L., Sudarsan, N., Weinberg, Z., Roth, A., Stockbridge, R. B., & Breaker, R. R. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215063 · Cited by 438
The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle
Wallace, R. J., Rooke, J. A., McKain, N., Duthie, C.-A., Hyslop, J. J., Ross, D. W., Waterhouse, A., Watson, M., & Roehe, R. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2032-0 · Cited by 416
Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome
Shi, W., Moon, C. D., Leahy, S. C., Kang, D., Froula, J., Kittelmann, S., Fan, C., Deutsch, S., Gagic, D., Seedorf, H., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.168245.113 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Pope, P. B., Denman, S. E., Jones, M., Tringe, S. G., Barry, K., Malfatti, S. A., McHardy, A. C., Cheng, J.-F., Hugenholtz, P., McSweeney, C. S., & Morrison, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-07-28
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 14793-14798
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2117582473
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation to herbivory by the Tammar wallaby includes bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles different from other herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1005297107
- The paper
- Pope, P. B., Denman, S. E., Jones, M., Tringe, S. G., Barry, K., Malfatti, S. A., McHardy, A. C., Cheng, J.-F., Hugenholtz, P., McSweeney, C. S., & Morrison, M. (2010). Adaptation to herbivory by the Tammar wallaby includes bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles different from other herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005297107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
