The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral consequences of dopamine deficiency in the Drosophila central nervous system
Open accessAbstract
The neuromodulatory function of dopamine (DA) is an inherent feature of nervous systems of all animals. To learn more about the function of neural DA in Drosophila , we generated mutant flies that lack tyrosine hydroxylase, and thus DA biosynthesis, selectively in the nervous system. We found that DA is absent or below detection limits in the adult brain of these flies. Despite this, they have a lifespan similar to WT flies. These mutants show reduced activity, extended sleep time, locomotor deficits that increase with age, and they are hypophagic. Whereas odor and electrical shock avoidance are not affected, aversive olfactory learning is abolished. Instead, DA-deficient flies have an apparently “masochistic” tendency to prefer the shock-associated odor 2 h after conditioning. Similarly, sugar preference is absent, whereas sugar stimulation of foreleg taste neurons induces normal proboscis extension. Feeding the DA precursor l -DOPA to adults substantially rescues the learning deficit as well as other impaired behaviors that were tested. DA-deficient flies are also defective in positive phototaxis, without alteration in visual perception and optomotor response. Surprisingly, visual tracking is largely maintained, and these mutants still possess an efficient spatial orientation memory. Our findings show that flies can perform complex brain functions in the absence of neural DA, whereas specific behaviors involving, in particular, arousal and choice require normal levels of this neuromodulator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwaerzel, M., Monastirioti, M., Scholz, H., Friggi-Grelin, F., Birman, S., & Heisenberg, M. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-33-10495.2003 · Cited by 871
Self-citationDopamine-deficient mice are severely hypoactive, adipsic, and aphagic
Zhou, Q.-Y., & Palmiter, R. D. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90145-0 · Cited by 731
A Neural Circuit Mechanism Integrating Motivational State with Memory Expression in Drosophila
Krashes, M. J., DasGupta, S., Vreede, A., White, B., Armstrong, J. D., & Waddell, S. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.035 · Cited by 598
Dopamine Is a Regulator of Arousal in the Fruit Fly
Kume, K., Kume, S., Park, S. K., Hirsh, J., & Jackson, F. R. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2048-05.2005 · Cited by 597
Self-citationRemote Control of Behavior through Genetically Targeted Photostimulation of Neurons
Lima, S. Q., & Miesenböck, G. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.004 · Cited by 562
Friggi‐Grelin, F., Coulom, H., Meller, M., Gomez, D., Hirsh, J., & Birman, S. (2003) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/neu.10185 · Cited by 550
Self-citationMao, Z. (2009) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/neuro.04.005.2009 · Cited by 532
Writing Memories with Light-Addressable Reinforcement Circuitry
Claridge-Chang, A., Roorda, R. D., Vrontou, E., Sjulson, L., Li, H., Hirsh, J., & Miesenböck, G. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.034 · Cited by 484
Self-citationNeuronal assemblies of the Drosophila mushroom body
Tanaka, N. K., Tanimoto, H., & Ito, K. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21692 · Cited by 470
Analysis of a spatial orientation memory in Drosophila
Neuser, K., Triphan, T., Mronz, M., Poeck, B., & Strauss, R. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07003 · Cited by 372
Self-citation
Cited by
Circadian Rhythms and Sleep in Drosophila melanogaster
Dubowy, C., & Sehgal, A. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.185157 · Cited by 420
Inagaki, H. K., Ben-Tabou de-Leon, S., Wong, A. M., Jagadish, S., Ishimoto, H., Barnea, G., Kitamoto, T., Axel, R., & Anderson, D. J. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.022 · Cited by 325
Deep homology of arthropod central complex and vertebrate basal ganglia.
Strausfeld, N. J., & Hirth, F. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231828 · Cited by 354
A gut microbial factor modulates locomotor behaviour in Drosophila
Schretter, C. E., Vielmetter, J., Bartos, I., Marka, Z., Marka, S., Argade, S., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0634-9 · Cited by 289
Inagaki, H. K., Panse, K. M., & Anderson, D. J. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.032 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Riemensperger, T., Isabel, G., Coulom, H., Neuser, K., Seugnet, L., Kume, K., Iché-Torres, M., Cassar, M., Strauss, R., Preat, T., Hirsh, J., & Birman, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-12-27
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 834-839
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2155540878
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioral consequences of dopamine deficiency in the Drosophila central nervous system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1010930108
- The paper
- Riemensperger, T., Isabel, G., Coulom, H., Neuser, K., Seugnet, L., Kume, K., Iché-Torres, M., Cassar, M., Strauss, R., Preat, T., Hirsh, J., & Birman, S. (2011). Behavioral consequences of dopamine deficiency in the Drosophila central nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010930108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.