Cited by 289Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchGut microbiota and healthInsect symbiosis and bacterial influences

A gut microbial factor modulates locomotor behaviour in Drosophila

Open access
Schretter, Catherine E., Vielmetter, Jost, Bartos, Imre, Marka, Zsuzsa, Marka, Szabolcs, Argade, Sulabha, Mazmanian, Sarkis K.·2018·Nature

Abstract

While research into the biology of animal behaviour has primarily focused on the central nervous system, cues from peripheral tissues and the environment have been implicated in brain development and function 1. There is emerging evidence that bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain affects behaviours including anxiety, cognition, nociception and social interaction 1-9. Coordinated locomotor behaviour is critical for the survival and propagation of animals, and is regulated by internal and external sensory inputs 10,11. However, little is known about how the gut microbiome influences host locomotion, or the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved. Here we report that germ-free status or antibiotic treatment results in hyperactive locomotor behaviour in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Increased walking speed and daily activity in the absence of a gut microbiome are rescued by mono-colonization with specific bacteria, including the fly commensal Lactobacillus brevis. The bacterial enzyme xylose isomerase from L. brevis recapitulates the locomotor effects of microbial colonization by modulating sugar metabolism in flies. Notably, thermogenetic activation of octopaminergic neurons or exogenous administration of octopamine, the invertebrate counterpart of noradrenaline, abrogates the effects of xylose isomerase on Drosophila locomotion. These findings reveal a previously unappreciated role for the gut microbiome in modulating locomotion, and identify octopaminergic neurons as mediators of peripheral microbial cues that regulate motor behaviour in animals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0634-9

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gut microbiota has been shown to modulate locomotor activity in Drosophila, probably via bacterial-derived metabolites.

    “the gut microbiota has been shown to modulate locomotor activity in Drosophila, probably via bacterial-derived metabolites (Schretter et al., 2018), (Chen et al., 2019).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Schretter et al., 2018

    The main text (page not provided) reports that gut bacteria modulate locomotion in Drosophila. It identifies a bacterial enzyme, xylose isomerase, as the active factor and links its effect to changes in host sugar metabolism; it does not establish that bacterial-derived metabolites mediate the effect. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schretter, C. E., Vielmetter, J., Bartos, I., Marka, Z., Marka, S., Argade, S., & Mazmanian, S. K.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Schretter, Catherine E.
  • Mazmanian, Sarkis K.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-10-24
Volume
563
Issue
7731
Pages
402-406
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2897165841
Cited by
289
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 2
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS085910)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Keywords
gut microbiota, locomotor behaviour, Drosophila melanogaster, antibiotic therapy, Lactobacillus brevis, xylose isomerase, sugar metabolism, octopaminergic neurons, octopamine, gut-brain signaling, microbial colonization, hyperactivity, commensal bacteria
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Germ-Free Life, Locomotion, Motor Activity, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Octopamine, Symbiosis, Aldose-Ketose Isomerases, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Levilactobacillus brevis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review