Identifying barriers to Muslim integration in France
Open accessAbstract
Is there a Muslim disadvantage in economic integration for second-generation immigrants to Europe? Previous research has failed to isolate the effect that religion may have on an immigrant family's labor market opportunities because other factors, such as country of origin or race, confound the result. This paper uses a correspondence test in the French labor market to identify and measure this religious effect. The results confirm that in the French labor market, anti-Muslim discrimination exists: a Muslim candidate is 2.5 times less likely to receive a job interview callback than is his or her Christian counterpart. A high-n survey reveals, consistent with expectations from the correspondence test, that second-generation Muslim households in France have lower income compared with matched Christian households. The paper thereby contributes to both substantive debates on the Muslim experience in Europe and methodological debates on how to measure discrimination. Following the National Academy of Sciences’ 2001 recommendations on combining a variety of methodologies and applying them to real-world situations, this research identifies, measures, and infers consequences of discrimination based on religious affiliation, controlling for potentially confounding factors, such as race and country of origin.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adida et al. (2010) found higher discrimination against an immigrant from Senegal with signals of Muslim religion than one with Christian signals.
“Adida et al. (2010), for example, find evidence of higher discrimination against an immigrant from Senegal with signals of Muslim religion than one with Christian signals.”
From Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments (2021) · cites this paper as Adida et al. (2010)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [2]Sniderman P, Hagedoorn L (2007) When Ways of Life Collide (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
- [5]Laurence J, Vaisse J (2006) Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).
- [8]Blank RM, Dabady M, Citro CF, eds (2004) Measuring Racial Discrimination: National Research Council Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).
- [11]Duguet E, Leandri N, L ' Horty Y, Petit P (2008) Are young French jobseekers of ethnic immigrant origin discriminated against? A controlled experiment in the Paris area. SSRN eLibrary. Available at http://ssrn.com/paper=1138244. Accessed May 15, 2010.
- [19]Wolff F, Spilerman S, Attias-Donfut C (2007) Transfers from migrants to their children: Evidence that altruism and cultural factors matter. Review of Income and Wealth 53: 619 -644.
- [20]Sekhon JS (2009) Opiates for the matches: Matching methods for causal inference. SSRN eLibrary. Available at http://ssrn.com/paper=1600553. Accessed May 15, 2010.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination
HAINMUELLER, J., & HANGARTNER, D. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000494 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Different groups, different threats: public attitudes towards immigrants
Hellwig, T., & Sinno, A. (2017) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2016.1202749 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments
Quillian, L., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090420-035144 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Pierné, G. (2013) · IZA Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1186/2193-8997-2-4 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adida, C. L., Laitin, D. D., & Valfort, M.-A.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-11-22
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 22384-22390
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3012481
- OpenAlex
- W2113432617
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 29.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Keywords
- Muslim immigrants, religious discrimination, immigrant children, economic integration, correspondence test, household income, France, discrimination measurement
- MeSH terms
- Christianity, Data Collection, Emigration and Immigration, Employment, France, Humans, Income, Islam, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review