Cited by 405Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration and Labor Dynamics

Identifying barriers to Muslim integration in France

Open access
Adida, Claire L., Laitin, David D., Valfort, Marie-Anne·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Is there a Muslim disadvantage in economic integration for second-generation immigrants to Europe? Previous research has failed to isolate the effect that religion may have on an immigrant family's labor market opportunities because other factors, such as country of origin or race, confound the result. This paper uses a correspondence test in the French labor market to identify and measure this religious effect. The results confirm that in the French labor market, anti-Muslim discrimination exists: a Muslim candidate is 2.5 times less likely to receive a job interview callback than is his or her Christian counterpart. A high-n survey reveals, consistent with expectations from the correspondence test, that second-generation Muslim households in France have lower income compared with matched Christian households. The paper thereby contributes to both substantive debates on the Muslim experience in Europe and methodological debates on how to measure discrimination. Following the National Academy of Sciences’ 2001 recommendations on combining a variety of methodologies and applying them to real-world situations, this research identifies, measures, and infers consequences of discrimination based on religious affiliation, controlling for potentially confounding factors, such as race and country of origin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1015550107

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adida et al. (2010) found higher discrimination against an immigrant from Senegal with signals of Muslim religion than one with Christian signals.

    “Adida et al. (2010), for example, find evidence of higher discrimination against an immigrant from Senegal with signals of Muslim religion than one with Christian signals.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [2]Sniderman P, Hagedoorn L (2007) When Ways of Life Collide (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
  2. [5]Laurence J, Vaisse J (2006) Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).
  3. [8]Blank RM, Dabady M, Citro CF, eds (2004) Measuring Racial Discrimination: National Research Council Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).
  4. [11]Duguet E, Leandri N, L ' Horty Y, Petit P (2008) Are young French jobseekers of ethnic immigrant origin discriminated against? A controlled experiment in the Paris area. SSRN eLibrary. Available at http://ssrn.com/paper=1138244. Accessed May 15, 2010.
  5. [19]Wolff F, Spilerman S, Attias-Donfut C (2007) Transfers from migrants to their children: Evidence that altruism and cultural factors matter. Review of Income and Wealth 53: 619 -644.
  6. [20]Sekhon JS (2009) Opiates for the matches: Matching methods for causal inference. SSRN eLibrary. Available at http://ssrn.com/paper=1600553. Accessed May 15, 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adida, C. L., Laitin, D. D., & Valfort, M.-A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-22
Volume
107
Issue
52
Pages
22384-22390
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2113432617
Cited by
405
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
29.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
Keywords
Muslim immigrants, religious discrimination, immigrant children, economic integration, correspondence test, household income, France, discrimination measurement
MeSH terms
Christianity, Data Collection, Emigration and Immigration, Employment, France, Humans, Income, Islam, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review