The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a unified model capable of explaining the mechanisms of interaction of ultrasound and biological tissue at both the diagnostic nonthermal, noncavitational (<100 mW·cm −2 ) and therapeutic, potentially cavitational (>100 mW·cm −2 ) spatial peak temporal average intensity levels. The cellular-level model (termed “bilayer sonophore”) combines the physics of bubble dynamics with cell biomechanics to determine the dynamic behavior of the two lipid bilayer membrane leaflets. The existence of such a unified model could potentially pave the way to a number of controlled ultrasound-assisted applications, including CNS modulation and blood–brain barrier permeabilization. The model predicts that the cellular membrane is intrinsically capable of absorbing mechanical energy from the ultrasound field and transforming it into expansions and contractions of the intramembrane space. It further predicts that the maximum area strain is proportional to the acoustic pressure amplitude and inversely proportional to the square root of the frequency ( ) and is intensified by proximity to free surfaces, the presence of nearby microbubbles in free medium, and the flexibility of the surrounding tissue. Model predictions were experimentally supported using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of multilayered live-cell goldfish epidermis exposed in vivo to continuous wave (CW) ultrasound at cavitational (1 MHz) and noncavitational (3 MHz) conditions. Our results support the hypothesis that ultrasonically induced bilayer membrane motion, which does not require preexistence of air voids in the tissue, may account for a variety of bioeffects and could elucidate mechanisms of ultrasound interaction with biological tissue that are currently not fully understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disrupting the blood–brain barrier by focused ultrasound induces sterile inflammation
Kovacs, Z. I., Kim, S., Jikaria, N., Qureshi, F., Milo, B., Lewis, B. K., Bresler, M., Burks, S. R., & Frank, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614777114 · Cited by 458
Image-Guided Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulates Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Lee, W., Kim, H., Jung, Y., Song, I.-U., Chung, Y. A., & Yoo, S.-S. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep08743 · Cited by 414
Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery
Kooiman, K., Vos, H. J., Versluis, M., & de Jong, N. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.003 · Cited by 401
Evolving Drug Delivery Strategies to Overcome the Blood Brain Barrier
S. Hersh, D., S. Wadajkar, A., B. Roberts, N., G. Perez, J., P. Connolly, N., Frenkel, V., A. Winkles, J., F. Woodworth, G., & J. Kim, A. (2016) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612822666151221150733 · Cited by 387
Self-citationLow-intensity ultrasound neuromodulation: An overview of mechanisms and emerging human applications
Fomenko, A., Neudorfer, C., Dallapiazza, R. F., Kalia, S. K., & Lozano, A. M. (2018) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.013 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Krasovitski, B., Frenkel, V., Shoham, S., & Kimmel, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-02-07
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3258-3263
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2014840564
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1015771108
- The paper
- Krasovitski, B., Frenkel, V., Shoham, S., & Kimmel, E. (2011). Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015771108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.