Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defining the cellular precursors to human breast cancer

Open access
Keller, Patricia J., Arendt, Lisa M., Skibinski, Adam, Logvinenko, Tanya, Klebba, Ina, Dong, Shumin, Smith, Avi E., Prat, Aleix, Perou, Charles M., Gilmore, Hannah, Schnitt, Stuart, Naber, Stephen P., Garlick, Jonathan A., Kuperwasser, Charlotte·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human breast cancers are broadly classified based on their gene-expression profiles into luminal- and basal-type tumors. These two major tumor subtypes express markers corresponding to the major differentiation states of epithelial cells in the breast: luminal (EpCAM + ) and basal/myoepithelial (CD10 + ). However, there are also rare types of breast cancers, such as metaplastic carcinomas, where tumor cells exhibit features of alternate cell types that no longer resemble breast epithelium. Until now, it has been difficult to identify the cell type(s) in the human breast that gives rise to these various forms of breast cancer. Here we report that transformation of EpCAM + epithelial cells results in the formation of common forms of human breast cancer, including estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative tumors with luminal and basal-like characteristics, respectively, whereas transformation of CD10 + cells results in the development of rare metaplastic tumors reminiscent of the claudin-low subtype. We also demonstrate the existence of CD10 + breast cells with metaplastic traits that can give rise to skin and epidermal tissues. Furthermore, we show that the development of metaplastic breast cancer is attributable, in part, to the transformation of these metaplastic breast epithelial cells. These findings identify normal cellular precursors to human breast cancers and reveal the existence of a population of cells with epidermal progenitor activity within adult human breast tissues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1017626108

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Keller, P. J., Arendt, L. M., Skibinski, A., Logvinenko, T., Klebba, I., Dong, S., Smith, A. E., Prat, A., Perou, C. M., Gilmore, H., Schnitt, S., Naber, S. P., Garlick, J. A., & Kuperwasser, C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-09-21
Volume
109
Issue
8
Pages
2772-2777
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2041263494
Cited by
233
References
2
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining the cellular precursors to human breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1017626108
The paper
Keller, P. J., Arendt, L. M., Skibinski, A., Logvinenko, T., Klebba, I., Dong, S., Smith, A. E., Prat, A., Perou, C. M., Gilmore, H., Schnitt, S., Naber, S. P., Garlick, J. A., & Kuperwasser, C. (2012). Defining the cellular precursors to human breast cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1017626108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.